Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Frank Coluccio Technology Forum - ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Srexley who wrote (1729)	6/5/2000 2:24:00 AM
From: KW Wingman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1782

To: dave horne who started this subject From: Srexley Friday, Jun 2, 2000 4:21 PM ET Reply # of 35 you wrote: ( and those book burners did not answer you) "Any SI member who I exclude can be "unexcluded" with sufficient demand from the thread participants. I do NOT reserve the right to have the final say." What does this mean? Were (are) you able to keep people off of the thread? Sounds kind of ominous. How is it different than the ignore feature?

To: Srexley who wrote (1729)	6/7/2000 1:27:00 AM
From: KW Wingman	Respond to of 1782

Please read all the posts of Silkroad again. I'll get back to you later.

To: Srexley who wrote (1729)	6/13/2000 12:45:00 AM
From: KW Wingman	Respond to of 1782

Slickroad <Should be coming to a courtroom near you soon, and I'm going to follow it the best I can and continue to post what I know on the SR thread. If people are exposed to the entire SR cycle from hyped up technological breakthrough to courtroom ashes maybe they will not be so quick to invest in such high risk ventures. That would actually result in people saving money, right? > Please do continue to post what you know on the SR thread. You may help someone.

To: Srexley who wrote (1729)	6/13/2000 1:29:00 AM
From: KW Wingman	Respond to of 1782

You said that you hated to admit that Kachina was correct all this time. Does it sound to you that he may have any suspicion's about Frank and Ahhaha? If so, do you think there is a chance that he may be correct again? Message 13863661 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< To: Dan Marus Plesse' who wrote (607) From: Kachina Sunday, Jun 11, 2000 4:00 AM ET Reply # of 609 I wonder if this has anything to do with the complaints I filed with the SEC and the San Diego PD on these guys. Clearing out of town before the cops take them away? I still say that I do not believe that there ever was a technology here at all. Everything that they did could be done with off the shelf components. And their materials were replete with basic errors in physics. I also, at this time, believe that Ahaha is unlikely to be what he claims to be. I would suggest care in the future relative to anything that he says. And Frank? Who are you really? Why did you cooperate, apparently, with this? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now to answer your question, You wrote: <To: dave horne who started this subject From: Srexley Friday, Jun 2, 2000 4:21 PM ET Reply # of 35 What does this mean? Were (are) you able to keep people off of the thread? Sounds kind of ominous. How is it different than the ignore feature? What does this mean? Were (are) you able to keep people off of the thread?> That is exactly what it means - I am not allowed me to post on the new thread. This way they can keep the new thread pure for true believers in the faith. I post heresy, I don't "bless Franks' cotton socks".