SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Wind River going up, up, up! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KevRupert who wrote (7886)6/2/2000 3:56:00 PM
From: Richard Knox  Respond to of 10309
 
advalorem -- I agree.

That's the beauty of WIND at this price. It's not factoring in certain realities which will unfold in the next 12-24 months. Wind will grow faster and margins will improve. I consider the "back of the napkin" analysis I presented to be a conservative starting point. Hang in there and buy on dips like today.



To: KevRupert who wrote (7886)6/2/2000 5:02:00 PM
From: KevRupert  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10309
 
egroup postings:

The following issues were areas of concern according on the egroup email dialogue:

1) analysts asked easy questions, and management answered with generalties.

2) It appeared management was selective in who made it
into the queue. Management didn't talk to those who "might make it difficult".

3) Management gave financial breakdowns on some, but not all parts, for example - there wasn't a breakdown of vertical revenues.

4) Financial guidance was questionable. There wasn't a clear direction if revenues were increased, and earnings lowered going foward.

5) Management met the revenue numbers, but there were multiple non-recurring charges and extraordinary gains. Not clear if the company met or missed the number.

6) Why doesn't the company set an achievable operating number and execute? Why not under promise and over deliver? This is what the street is looking for. Not the constant games that the management team plays.

Will 8/31/2000 be the same? The street thinks so.