SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (51386)6/4/2000 3:41:00 PM
From: Steve Robinett  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 53903
 
--jhg
What do I think of Smith Barney's $1.99/shr earnings estimate for MU in 2000? In Q1, we had $.60/share due to a Taiwan earthquake shortage. In Q2, we got back to "normal" with $.29/share. Based on the average selling price of 64Meg PC100 SDRAM in Q3 (MU's major product in the quarter), I estimate $.20 for the most recent quarter. That equals $1.09. To get $1.99 for the here, MU has to make $.90/share in Q4. That will require an ASP of something like $9. What do I think of that $1.99 estimate. Whoever put it out is dreaming. (Speaking of double-talk, what's the difference between "buy" and "accumulate" in Smith Barney's comment? How do I place an accumulate order but not a buy order?) As I said in my original post, I'm guesstimating $1.35/share in 2000.
Best
--Steve



To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (51386)6/4/2000 11:21:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 53903
 
"If we really see supply growth decelerate as we expect, there is considerable upside to our earnings estimates for Micron," Osha said.

why not tell us what that is? btw, you can't have it both ways. you can't say that dram prices will firm or go up and that pc makers expect an increase in eps growth. is salomon stating publicly that dram profits will hurt the boxmakers?

or, rather, do they tout BOTH, knowing there is a good chance they will be right on one? ;-)