SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldsnow who wrote (16622)6/3/2000 4:17:00 PM
From: Yaacov  Respond to of 17770
 
Yes, indeed Prodi is an "Idiot." When he was a prime minster
a couple of years ago, he seemed to be half priest and half
prostitute! Never knew which half prvailed! Then he his "Olivo" coalation collapsed. For his resignation he was
given the present posiion, he was not appointed!



To: goldsnow who wrote (16622)6/4/2000 10:42:00 AM
From: George Papadopoulos  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17770
 
and the Nato sponsored ethnic cleansing continues...

Armed Albanians attack Serb farmers in Kosovo's American sector
4.32 p.m. ET (2043 GMT) June 1, 2000

By Danica Kirka, Associated Press

PRISTINA, Yugoslavia (AP) ? Ethnic Albanians opened fire Thursday on a
group of Serbs walking home from a cemetery in the American sector of
Kosovo, killing one woman and wounding three men, U.S. authorities
said.

The attack near the village of Klokot occurred a day after gunmen
killed a Serb man in northern Kosovo as he stood outside his home
beside his father, touching off a riot that injured two NATO
peacekeepers.

U.S. officials said Thursday's attack occurred along the main road
between Urosevac and Gnjilane, about 25 miles south of Pristina. The
Yugoslav news agency Beta identified the dead woman as Lepterka
Marinkovic, 67, and the wounded men as Petar Tomic, 33, Dobrivoje
Radic, 50, and Mladen Mirkovic, 68.

The wounded were taken to the U.S. Army's Camp Bondsteel for treatment.

Beta said nine Serbs have been killed in Klokot in the year since NATO-
led peacekeepers arrived after the 78-day NATO bombing campaign. More
than 20 Serbs have been wounded in attacks by ethnic Albanians, it
said.

On Wednesday, the drive-by shooting in the northern Kosovo village of
Babin Most killed 33-year-old Serb Milutin Trajkovic.

After the shooting, NATO-led troops manning checkpoints throughout the
region were put on alert, according to Flight Lt. Rob Hannam, a
spokesman for British forces.

He said Trajkovic's father sought help at a NATO checkpoint, where
peacekeepers administered first aid and then evacuated the wounded man
to a French military hospital, but he died en route.

Suspects are still being sought.

After the shooting, about 40 to 50 Serbs gathered on the road outside
Babin Most to protest the attack. The crowd blocked the road and later
grew violent, overturning a Norwegian tactical vehicle and setting it
on fire.

One soldier was treated for smoke inhalation and another soldier was
treated for an arm injury, NATO said in a statement. Both were treated
and released.



To: goldsnow who wrote (16622)6/5/2000 4:54:00 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Respond to of 17770
 
It need hardly be said that the subtlest practitioners of doublethink are those who invented doublethink and know that it is a vast system of mental cheating. In our society, those who have the best knowledge of what is happening are also those who are furthest from seeing the world as it is. In general, the greater the understanding, the greater the delusion; the more intelligent, the less sane.

G. Orwell, 1984.
( Message 12958981 )

...why should the democratic discussion in which the majority participates lead to better result, when, cognitively, the ignorance of the majority remains. The political frustration of the majority is thus understandable: they are called to decide, while, at the same time, receiving the message that they are in no position effectively to decide, i.e. to objectively weigh the pros and cons. The recourse to "conspiracy theories" is a desperate way out of this deadlock, an attempt to regain a minimum of what Fred Jameson calls "cognitive mapping."

Jodi Dean(3) drew attention to a curious phenomenon clearly observable in the "dialogue of the mutes" between the official ("serious," academically institutionalized) science and the vast domain of so-called pseudo-sciences, from ufology to those who want to decipher the secrets of the pyramids: one cannot but be struck by how it is the official scientists who proceed in a dogmatic dismissive way, while the pseudo-scientists refer to facts and argumentation deprived of the common prejudices. Of course, the answer will be here that established scientists speak with the authority of the big Other of the scientific Institution; but the problem is that, precisely, this scientific big Other is again and again revealed as a consensual symbolic fiction. So when we are confronted with conspiracy theories, we should proceed in a strict homology to the proper reading of Henry James' The Turn of the Screw: we should neither accept the existence of ghosts as part of the (narrative) reality nor reduce them, in a pseudo-Freudian way, to the "projection" of the heroine's hysterical sexual frustrations.

Conspiracy theories, of course, are not to be accepted as "fact" - however, one should also not reduce them to the phenomenon of modern mass hysteria. Such a notion still relies on the "big Other," on the model of "normal" perception of shared social reality, and thus does not take into account how it is precisely this notion of reality that
is undermined today. The problem is not that ufologists and conspiracy theorists regress to a paranoiac attitude unable to accept (social) reality; the problem is that this reality itself is becoming paranoiac. Contemporary experience again and again confronts us with situations in which we are compelled to take note of how our sense of reality and normal attitude towards it is grounded in a symbolic fiction, i.e. how the "big Other" that determines what counts as normal and accepted truth, what is the horizon of meaning in a given society, is in no way directly grounded in "facts" as rendered by the scientific "knowledge in the real." Let us take a traditional society in which modern science is not yet elevated into the Master-discourse: if, in its symbolic space, an individual advocates propositions of modern science, he will be dismissed as "madman" - and the key point is that it is not enough to say that he is not "really mad," that it is merely the narrow ignorant society which puts him in this position - in a certain way, being treated as a madman, being excluded from the social big Other, effectively EQUALS being mad. "Madness" is not the designation which can be grounded in a direct reference to "facts" (in the sense that a madman is unable to perceive things the way they really are, since he is caught in his hallucinatory projections), but only with regard to the way an individual relates to the "big Other." Lacan usually emphasizes the opposite aspect of this paradox: "the madman is not only a beggar who thinks he is a king, but also a king who thinks he is a king," i.e. madness designates the collapse of the distance between the Symbolic and the Real, an immediate identification with the symbolic mandate; or, to take his other exemplary statement, when a husband is
pathologically jealous, obsessed by the idea that his wife sleeps with other men, his obsession remains a pathological feature even if it is proven that he is right and that his wife effectively sleeps with other men. The lesson of such paradoxes is clear: pathological jealously is not a matter of getting the facts false, but of the way these facts are integrated into the subject's libidinal economy. However, what one should assert here is that the same paradox should also be performed as it were in the opposite direction: the society (its socio-symbolic field, the big Other) is "sane" and "normal" even when it is proven factually wrong. (Maybe, it was in this sense that the late Lacan designated himself as "psychotic": he effectively was psychotic insofar as it was not possible to integrate his discourse into the field of the big Other.)

One is tempted to claim, in the Kantian mode, that the mistake of the conspiracy theory is somehow homologous to the "paralogism of the pure reason," to the confusion between the two levels: the suspicion (of the received scientific, social, etc. common sense) as the formal methodological stance, and the positivation of this suspicion in another all-explaining global para-theory.
[snip]

Excerpted from:

THE MATRIX, OR, THE TWO SIDES OF
PERVERSION: Slavoj Zizek


platon.ee.duth.gr



To: goldsnow who wrote (16622)6/7/2000 5:02:00 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17770
 
FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT
INSIDE TRACK ON WORLD NEWS
by international syndicated columnist & broadcaster Eric Margolis

December 5, 1999


Who's really in charge in Russia?

NEW YORK - A creeping coup in Moscow by military and security hardliners has been underway for the past three months, leaving President Boris Yeltsin an isolated, increasingly irrelevant figurehead.

Until recently, no one person or group was fully in charge of Russia's fragmented political system. Rival factions vied for power in a modern form of tribal warfare. Financial fortunes amassed through corruption and crime were used to buy political power, which was then used to make yet more illicit fortunes. The chief protagonists in this brutal Darwinist drama were Yeltsin and his coterie, financed by huge infusions of western cash; the military, interior ministry and security establishment; a group of business tycoons and their media networks; the state bureaucracy; and various mafias, who run 60% of Russia's business.

This barely controlled chaos began to change in late August. Boris Yeltsin, according to information this column has received from Moscow, was forced under threat of ouster, to appoint an unknown KGB officer, Vladimir Putin, as prime minister. At first, the hatchet-faced Putin was dismissed as non-entity who would soon be replaced in Yeltsin's game of musical prime ministers. But the dour Putin, displaying remarkable skill for a former intelligence appartchik, quickly solidified his power base and took charge.

In fact, Putin was the frontman for an ad hoc coalition of Russia's security organs: the armed forces, Ministry of the Interior, and the internal security service, FSB, and the external spy service, SVR --or KGB, as they are both still universally known.

One of the new coalition's first act was to go after key Yeltsin ally, billionaire robber baron Boris Berezovsky. He was accused of a variety of crimes and put under investigation. Curiously, Berezovsky had channeled US $1 million to the Chechens --for reasons that still remain obscure.

A series of mysterious bomb attacks on apartment buildings killed 300 people. Moscow blamed Chechens, who, after 250 years of bitter resistance, had broken away from Russian rule during a bitter war in 1994-1996. The awkward fact that a group of Russian security agents were caught red-handed planting explosives was covered up.

Taking a leaf from Serb propaganda strategy in Kosovo, Putin and his allies whipped up hatred of Chechens, inciting Slavic nationalism and traditional Russian racism against Muslims and darker-skinned people, and proclaimed a crusade against `Islamic terrorists' and `bandits' (Chechens).

Moscow's propaganda organs went into high gear, trumpeting Russia was waging a `war against terrorism,' and claiming, without any evidence, that the shadowy Osama Bin Laden was behind the Chechen insurgents. This clever ploy neatly scotched criticism from the Clinton Administration, which had also proclaimed a crusade against Islamic malefactors and was waging its own mini-war against Iraq.

The Russian armed forces and KGB thirsted for revenge for their previous defeat in Chechnya (Ishkeria, as Chechen call it). Using the apartment bombings and a minor Chechen incursion into Dagestan as a pretext, 100,000 Russian troops launched a massive, scorched earth campaign that seemed designed to kill as many Chechen as possible, raze all towns and villages that resisted, and bring the rebellious region to heel by making a desert and calling it peace. To date, 250,000 Chechens have become refugees.

In November, Yeltsin, under growing pressure from western public opinion, tried to rein in his generals. A number of senior officers, including the chief of staff and the commander of Russian forces in Chechnya, openly refused to obey Kremlin orders to relent, and threatened mass resignations or an outright putsch.

Meanwhile, the ailing, 68-year old Yeltsin, was increasingly sidelined while his allies were being steadily eliminated by the hard liners. This week, Yeltsin, whose immune system has been gravely weakened by heart bypass surgery, was in the hospital with pneumonia for the second time in two months. He is reported to be seriously ill. The triumverate of the military, interior ministry, and KGB led by Putin is now running day-to-day government business in Russia.

Neither Washington nor its allies, including Canada, know how to react to the stealthy coup. They keep pretending Yeltsin and his crew are still in full charge, and continue pouring money in to buy Russia's `good' behavior. Just as the US-controlled International Monetary Fund was announcing a further US$700 million `loan' to Moscow, Putin declared bankrupt Russia would spend another $US110 million on war in Chechnya, which has already cost Moscow some $1.2 billion.

Russian soldiers fighting in Chechnya receive a special US $1,000 monthly cash bonus --a whopping sum for Russia, where the average monthly salary is $60. Small wonder Chechen and their increasingly enraged supporters around the world believe the US is financing Russia's savage war in the Caucasus.

Putin's anti-Chechen crusade and resulting war hysteria in Russia has silenced all domestic criticism of the government. It has also taken the wind out of the sails of the major opposition political movement, led by Moscow's capable mayor, Yuri Luzkhov and former prime minister, Yevgenny Primakov. Even the huge theft and money laundering scandal that threatened to engulf the Yeltsin regime and curtail the inflow of US money has now been forgotten - thanks to the convenient little war in Chechnya.

Copyright Eric Margolis 1999