To: MikeM54321 who wrote (7163 ) 6/3/2000 2:00:00 PM From: Frank A. Coluccio Respond to of 12823
Mike, that was a very good roll-up in this space, which I've already bookmarked and will pass along to some journos who I know are doing research in this area. Let me reiterate, however, that Tachyon and some of the others you mentioned --I can only speak to Tachyon with a degree of confidence from my own knowledge base-- will not limit their services to a few residentials who are serious power users, and who can afford it. They will also be serving ISPs who will themselves distribute access links via wireless to their subscribers, and in this case particularly, Tachyon will be providing RURAL ISPs' with both their down and up link requirements directly to the 'net. On the other side of the up-downs these links access the 'net (in the case of Tachyon) through backbone and web service agreements with Concentric, if I'm not mistaken. These services will have the most profound beneficial impact in rural areas where ISPs will establish their own wireless hubs, using low powered spread spectrum radios (albeit, where they will make the most impact is also where they will need to be line of sight) in remote regions where fiber and the big gun xMDSes will not go. Think of it as a hybridized satellite/wireless hub topology , very similar to what was proposed in the Alphanet service (Telecrossing.net). In the case of Tachyon they will not only be targeting areas to skin cream like some of the others --well, I suppose that the quality that makes cream, cream, is in the eye of the beholder-- but they will target areas where they will be delivering services to end users capable of operating at Ethernet speeds (at the hub and link distribution levels to homes and between users of the same hub, in any event) in very deep boon dock spaces, as well. FWIW. FAC