SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Befriend the Trend Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jesso who wrote (8006)6/4/2000 3:07:00 PM
From: Ken Adams  Respond to of 39683
 
Your 65 minute bars probably made the difference. I don't have access to intra-day history, so all my testing was done on EOD data... a big difference.

I certainly didn't test our entire stable, because it was obvious early on that it was a waste of time. It's possible to do the kind of backtesting we need by putting up about 6 months of daily data and throwing an eyeball on it.

Still, we're talking two very different animals between hourly charts the way TC has found success, and the EOD method. I recommend different MAs for each, as I've mentioned here in earlier posts.

Ken



To: jesso who wrote (8006)6/4/2000 3:29:00 PM
From: Dr. Stoxx  Respond to of 39683
 
I'd take 400% over 3 years anyday!

But I think we can better than that...!!

Who knows? Maybe someday we will all be trading this way...

TC



To: jesso who wrote (8006)6/4/2000 5:19:00 PM
From: CatLady  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 39683
 
I didn't load data going back as far as you did, just from 1/99, but I'm not finding that the same stocks that are doing well now with BTT-MAX did well in 1999. But the good news is that I AM finding some other stocks that did well.
EBAY in the first half of 99 and MESG from April to August as examples. I found a few more that were profitable, but Buy&Hold would've been much more profitable with them.