SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: milo_morai who wrote (103917)6/4/2000 4:47:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
The Truth hurts doesn't it.

What truth? This is the off the wall interpretation, with no proof of reality in it, from a person who has shown in a couple of years of SI posting that he has an ax to grind with Intel as big as Paul Bunyon's. It's his opinion. BFD.



To: milo_morai who wrote (103917)6/4/2000 4:51:00 PM
From: Felix Appolonia  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Milo <The Truth hurts doesn't it. Just passing on Good Info.>

The truth is that the stock keeps going higher and higher and higher, and will split and go even higher. All of these so called problems are part of the business. The truth is that INTC has the capacity and resources and the analysts know it and the stockholders love the stock. Perhaps you should take your comments to the "INTC Bashers only thread".

Felix



To: milo_morai who wrote (103917)6/4/2000 5:00:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
What's this, T-bird slower than PIII?

translator.go.com

I know,

1. The Thunderbird used was only 1000 MHz. AMD has much faster than that.

2. It was a beta, prototype, pre-production chip only.

3. That chip was kidnapped and tricked to run slower by Intel on its way to Tom.

4. Tom is an Intel bigot.

5. Tom used the wrong chipset/compiler/cpu meter.

6. They were all drunk on schnappes.