Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : 2000:The Make-or-Break Election -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.horn who wrote (47)	6/4/2000 8:42:00 PM
From: Dr. Stoxx	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1013

You've got a point there, "c", I'll grant you that. See my response (meant to post it you): Message 13826445 TC

To: c.horn who wrote (47)	6/4/2000 8:51:00 PM
From: sandintoes	Respond to of 1013

Aw, now here in lies the rub....a third party candidate is as much responsible for putting Clinton in the White House as any democrat who went to the polls and voted for him. Look how much good it did to vote for Perrot... How many said, "Mine is a protest vote!"? Some protest, and we have to suffer their protest! If you're going to vote a third party candidate, just be honest with yourself and vote for GORE, because that is exactly what you are doing! Others of you are looking forward to voting for Patrick J. Buchanan, newly of the Reform Party. Pat has been vilified, called a "Hitler lover" by Donald Trump - who himself joined the Reform Party's New York affiliate. But to those of you who want to feel good pulling the lever for Pat, let me give you a warning that you ought to take heed of. You want to pretend that a third party candidate can win, when he can't. It's fantasyland. That's right. I've said it. There is about as much chance of a third party candidate winning the White House in the year 2000 as there is of Bill Clinton telling the truth in a judicial proceeding.