Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cactus Jack who wrote (37740)	6/5/2000 1:23:00 AM
From: KeepItSimple	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42523

Give me a break. Voltaire told me on his thread that if I didn't stop making fun of him, that me and my family would suffer the wrath of his angels. Considering those angels are the schizophrenic voices in his head, that was a direct threat. If I phone up the white house, and say: "My angels are going to hurt the president" you can be sure men in dark suits would be paying me a visit shortly. They wouldn't be looking for my angels, I can tell you that much. My question has nothing to do with bullish or bearish outlooks on the market, but applies more to the honest use of words. Care to reconsider?

To: Cactus Jack who wrote (37740)	6/5/2000 7:21:00 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42523

Oh, please. What is the legal term for involuntary intercourse? The lady in question is an adult, and capable of deciding for herself how much sex she needs. For a stranger to assert that she needs more sex because she doesn't act right is a hostile act. It's just plain nasty and disgusting. Keep it in the locker room. I presume you are male - let me give you some unsolicited advice. Never tell your secretary she "needs to get laid so she will lighten up." You'll be slapped with a sexual harassment suit before you turn around. I repeat, in my opinion, any man who says about a stranger on television, "she needs a three day romp but not with me" because the woman in question has opinons about the stock market that he does not share is a sadistic creep. What kind of person would even think such a thing? Just because she's saying negative things about the stock market?