Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gnuman who wrote (43457)	6/5/2000 4:42:00 PM
From: Jdaasoc	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Gene: If I believe the the Photoshop benchmark, Intel is hosed. AMD is about 30% faster than Intel's SDRAM or 820 RDRAM solution. amd.com Intel's best benchmarks for Photoshop were with 840 chipset and RDRAM not listed by AMD. 840 chipset solution was about 30% faster than a BX solution using SDRAM @ 733 Mhz. I can't repost Intel's benchmark data since Intel pulled it down for whatever reason but if you will look back at one of my posts from 7-8 months ago the link to Intel's site was there. If AMD is able to get comparable speed to Intel's 840 chipset with dual channel RDRAM performance just by adding L2 cache, Intel has to respond with newer and more importantly cheaper technology ASAP. I have yet to see anything from Intel execpt for Willimette that would appear to beat this AMD offering. I expect that 815 chipsets using Coppermine processors, tweaked with PC133 CL2+ SDRAM, will narrow this gap significantly. Where does that leave RDRAM for next 3-4 months. Waiting for their desktop memory train to come in like they have been since June 98. I noticed just today that Dell is not offering any of their business computers in the Optiplex lineup with RDRAM. john