To: Hawkmoon who wrote (53761 ) 6/6/2000 12:24:00 AM From: d:oug Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116764
Ron, Good News can change Non News into a Bad News. The reverse I will avoid to give an example as it may or not be true, just as a horse has a tail, a tail has a horse we know is false and I forget the math axiom or other that states this, but Hutch for sure could tell us. So Ron, its Dougie Utters More Babble (DUMB) Time. Example: Ham. ============ No Ron, not you trying to be one, but i guess i, but its not the example, i, but that eating type from a pig. Now i know what a ham tastes like, and since most people did not have them there pigies running around where they lived like i did, along with folks on the farm that each year would cure and smoke and prepare them for a later eating. So i know how ham taste and i know that the hams in food markets have the label ham, but to me its like a spongy red colored tastless rubber. So this example is not for i but for those who know only of a ham taste from a can or plastic bag from food store. They will say "I buy the expense good ham" but i know that they are con'ed as what they say is good is still bad, its just not extremely bad. So let them taste a ham made the old fashion way, the right way, the way its done before corporate food stores started selling tons of it. So once they taste the way it really tastes, then poof the non news becomes bad news as they can not go back to the phony ham and accept it like before, like before when it was not a problem, they accepted it "as is." (on topic) Something like this will happen after folks see how paper money retains it value once a gold type backing is reintroducted, they will not want to go back to the old ways. Easy it is to read my post and obtain as a multiple choice not a question but as a result, as follows. 1. I never understood what he was saying. 2. I understood, but now do not. 3. I understand, but wish I did not. 4. I understand not to read his posts. ok Ron lets start over, and yes i realize that i may be here alone, talking to myself as you did an eXit lines above. But incase you is still here hear me out as the first line of this post was as follows. Good News can change Non News into a Bad News. So Ron I will take your views as correct and good and desirable. Ron you state that putting importance and significants and gold bug'ness onto the physical gold stuff is not only wrong but if accomplished would lead to poor results. ok, let it be so and lets identify your worst case example, that being the government of a nation doing that which you say is dangeous folly. Good versus Evil: Good = USA, Evil = China The above in regards to personal freedom in the area of free speech and thoughts. Hong Kong--June 5--China is believed to have been importing gold to increase the national gold reserves because of low prices in the international market... "If the American people realized that their entire gold supply has gone to potential enemy hands and that national security was at risk, I am sure that politicians could not stand the heat that they would receive from their electorate..." So Ron, if China's Central Bank got and gets more of the physical gold as a direct result of what GATA talks about, that being the USA government's policy in the Treasury/ESF and the debt effect thru GSEs and activities of Bullion Banks, that you Ron feel that China is "shooting themselves in the foot"? So Ron you see the USA selling it's Fort Knox physical gold to China's Central Bank as a good? Is this "Good News" Ron? Or is it a current "Non News" to become "Bad News"? Doug