Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (104041)	6/6/2000 12:22:00 AM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Joe, >In the past, AMD didn't have a competitive design, competitive process technology, enough capacity. AMD was also lacking in the design talent. Solutions to all the problem areas are in place now, IMO. That's why I think AMD of today is different from AMD in the past. Fine, seems to be enough business for both, and AMD will help keep the DOJ off Intel's back when Microsoft is done pounding their sorry arses into the ground (just felt like saying that!). Tony

To: Joe NYC who wrote (104041)	6/6/2000 9:23:00 AM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

What makes you think they(AMD) will be more successful in grabbing market share from INTC when times get tough than now? Seems to me that if they are to succeed, it's now or never. INTC has cash to help it through any downturn....AMD does not, let alone the resources to fight a giant(with price cuts no less since the consumer will once again be in the driver's seat) and stop the hemmoraging? Your statement that they can is illogical, no offense intended. BK