Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SyncMan who wrote (37185)	6/6/2000 7:13:00 AM
From: username	Respond to of 77400

I'm very comfortable with that relationship at this time. Yeah, that sounds rational. You could be in IR! <G> I looked for Great Employer Inc. on Hoovers but couldn't find it. Must be a real small company. <G> Thanks for taking the time to fill me in a bit. My weak spot is the technology end of this, my understanding of the actual technologies, how they work, what they do...so I appreciate all the help I can get from engineers and programmers. Congratulations on the baby! Let me know what products he/she likes so we can Peter Lynch the stock. <G>

To: SyncMan who wrote (37185)	6/6/2000 7:47:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 77400

>>: T. I am a big loather of the monolopolies. One of the worst outside of MSFT at this time imo is the baby bells. I can't wait until I can get phone/computer/tv service from one company.(sic) I dunno what monolopolies are but it sure sounds like you want a local monopoly. Cherry picking is best - satellite for TV, RBOC for DSL and the cheapest supplier for that commodity known as "long distance". >>And it looks like that company will either be TimeWarner or AT&T. Since ATT owns my cable company, I'm rooting for AT&T at this time. Cable is inferior to satellite for TV and by most accounts, it is inferior to DSL for net access. It certainly will be inferior to advanced wireless in the future.