Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ftth who wrote (67)	6/7/2000 2:53:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

If you go back to the first bandwidth commodity issue in the Cook Report (I think it was the May issue) which highlights Hanks (ex-Enron), he speaks about a parallel 100GByte scheme which sounds very much like this one. I believe he even spoke about data striping over multiple lambdae. The goal, in each case, was the movement of bits in a fungible way while "losing" the SONET baggage, between parties in a bandwidth commodity transaction. Lose the extra weight, in other words. The scheme looks great on paper. Problem is, you need two of these parallelers to communicate.