Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edwarda who wrote (80990)	6/7/2000 9:42:00 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

And some things I would not go see- but if other people want to see them, as long as people aren't harmed physically, I don't have a problem. Children need to be protected- as in Ebill's rape hypothetical, but merely because a naked child engenders in some people an atypical sexual response is NOT a reason to ban nude pictures of children- UNLESS they are designed to provoke the sexual response in people aroused by children After all the Christ child is often naked with his little penis dramatically in the foreground of the painting- if this turns some pedophiles on that is THEIR problem, and Christ's penis is really not (imo) to blame, nor are the artists to blame, nor is it necessary to "fig leaf" all instances of his penis.