Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jim kelley who wrote (43642)	6/7/2000 10:58:00 AM
From: blake_paterson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 93625

Jim: A letter from Hitachi counsel (see May 25 letter) requesting a copy of the license agreement was turned down by the commission. dockets.usitc.gov -- click "337" (left side) -- click on 337-431 "sdram" scroll down to: May 25, 2000 Letter from Hitachi Also, in Order #9, Judge Morriss also denied a motion for Summary Disposition / Determination, filed by Sega. dockets.usitc.gov -- click "337" (left side) -- click on 337-431 "sdram" scroll down to: May 24, 2000 Order Number 9 So I guess RMBS is up 3- 0 so far (ggg). If accepted, a Summary Determination would have resulted in immediate disposition of the case. I think this is a victory for RMBS, but the consequences are not clear. Of note, Morriss indicates that the current crux of the case with respect to Sega lies in Claim 23, US Patent 6,038,195. All other claims are dependant. Can you give some technical guidance on this one? Thanks in advance, BP