SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (4479)6/8/2000 6:09:00 PM
From: Kent Rattey  Respond to of 5853
 
1X chips are shipping now.
1X will be deployed Q4 2000 in Korea (SK Telecom),

SK Telecom Selects 3Com and Samsung 3G Wireless Solution for World's First CDMA2000 1X Network
SANTA CLARA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 5, 2000--
Standards-based Network Will Deliver Mobile Data Services at Speeds Up to 144kbps; Commercial Availability Scheduled for Q4 2000.

and Q1 2001 by Verizon.

Gerry Flynn, the company's director of technical development:
?Flynn said Verizon will deploy 1XRTT CDMA technology early next year.
That technology is a more data-centric wireless platform than Verizon
currently uses. "It nearly doubles our voice capacity," Flynn said. "Secondly, it gives us the
opportunity to offer (faster rates) of data."

2Mbps is the HDR application.

Compliments of engineer;
?It really is just a play on words. Both of them use frequency for voice and data. It just matters how you split them up. HDR does not share the SAME frequency space as voice.
In HDR, it can use one of the possible 1.25 MHz wide frequency slots for the HDR data. In a basic system you have the frequency space split into many 1.25 MHz bands. Usually these are all voice. Bu the fact that HDR and voice are on similair band sizes makes it even more flexible than the WCDMA scheme. The operator can mix and match the bands as they need them. Put on 7 bands of voice and one band of HDR during the peak hours (rush hour traffic) and perhaps mix it to 4 bands of voice and 4 bands of HDR during peak internet access time (evenings from 6-11 PM). The flexibility far outwieghs the loss of freqneucy space.
I believe we are into the most major FUD attack to try to get European vaporware accepted before Qualcomm comes out with their already tested system. Q is only a few months away from having 1xrtt plus HDR on the MSM chip and the radio doesn;t change, so expect the HDR rollout to be very fast when it happens.
Bottom line - Frequency use is Frequency use. You have to use it to send bits and the actually way you use it doesn't matter. In the end it is the entire capacity that you gain for the frequency you have. PERIOD.?

The WCDMA application from DoCoMo are trials as far as anyone can tell(brassboards).
From Raging Bull IDCC;

ragingbull.com

Another post from engineer who has been in charge of ASIC development at QCOM(18 months for ASIC development)

Clark,
I took the FPGA stuff to ASIC in 18 months right on the industry target. But you have to build test systems, RF test systems, etc. Alot more than just making the ASIC work. You have to field trial this in the real system and make real sure that you have all the bugs out of the real ASIC. This means you have to build alot of phones wiht them and test it before the carrier will allow you to sell to them. This took at least 18 months after the ASICs were out there. You can't go handing out 500 brassbaords and ask people to carry them around in thier breifcases, now can you?
Also, in todays market you had better have a high degree of integration on that ASIC. You cannot model something like the entire MSM chip today in FPGA because it is too many transistors. So you also have the issue of building a commerially viable cost effective chipset if it were to compete wiht all the major standards out there. You must have a bill of Materials less than $100 to compete in todays market as well as a sub 140 gm phone. So are they going to make 2-3 ASICs first, then come out wiht another which integrates the stuff?
One more note. While I was in charge of building the ASICS, I also was in charge of 16 phD level systems engineers who worked right along with the chip designers to make sure that the design of every circuit matched the system level design. This insured that the chip matched the system on the very first round. I wasn't aware that IDCC had this level of engineering staff available. If you outsource the design, then you have the "our company" versus "their company" problem of how to achieve the system design.
For history, the CDMA ASICS at FPGA were done in 1990, the first ASICS from this in 1991, the first MSM chip done in 1993, the first phones out into the commerical world in 1995, and high volume rollout in 1996.

A little EDGE info:

GPRS broadband wireless not so fast after all, says Nokia
theregister.co.uk
European operators are scheduled to introduce broadband wireless data services towards the end of this year, but it's beginning to look as if it's not all it's cracked up to be, and that they'll be going rapidly into reverse on the expectation management front. For starters, GPRS (General Packet Radio Service) is going to be a lot slower on the ground than you'd been led to believe, and unless some charitable elves drop off some new battery technology pronto, device endurance won't look too clever either.
Speaking in Helsinki at the end of last week Nokia executives warned that too much has been promised for GPRS and EDGE (Enhanced Data rates for Global Evolution). GPRS is being positioned as a bridge to 3G systems, and has had data rates of in excess of 100kbps claimed for it. By Nokia, among others. EDGE is a little further down the line, is of particular interest to US TDMA operators, and offers even higher speeds. Or it did, anyway - Nokia has claimed "packet data user rates of up to 473kbps."
But Nirvana has been postponed. Although people have been led to believe that GPRS devices will be able to achieve a comfortable equivalent of two ISDN channels while they're on the move, Nokia says bit rates will be deliverable in multiples of 13kbps, and if you allow a maximum of three timeslots you get - with the apparent addition of 4kbps of secret sauce - 43kbps. That of course depends on the network operator being able to deliver you the maximum; we wouldn't be at all surprised if under some conditions you wound up getting 13kbps, dangerously close to the current GSM data rate of 9.6kbps.
The downgrade holds good for EDGE, which has been promised at triple GPRS rates, so that means it will initially roll out at around 120kbps. GPRS is intended to roll out late this year, while the first EDGE systems are expected to launch in 2002.
According to Petri Poyhonen, head of Nokia's GPRS business programme, the press has a responsibility to get the right message across to users, who've been getting the wrong impression about GPRS. No doubt Nokia has a responsibility to go through its Web site and revise down all those recklessly large numbers itself, but Petri didn't mention that.
The real point of GPRS, says Poyhonen, is the permanent connection - and he's not wrong. If you can achieve 43kbps permanently via wireless, or even just 20kbps, in most cases you won't necessarily notice the relatively low speed, because you're not demanding data in heavy bursts, as you would via a dial-up connection.
But the other piece of bad news about GPRS may interfere with your ability to have a permanent connection for any great length of time. Nokia Mobile Phones CTO Yrjo Neuvo vigorously scotches rumours that trial GPRS systems have been bursting into flames (certainly not Nokia ones, he smiles, they're "very cool"), but he does concede that GPRS is a heavy drain on power.
This is something that'll carry over into 3G/UMTS systems, unless manufacturers can deliver substantially better battery life in the interim, but the major issue right now is the likely capability of the GPRS systems that'll have to go into mass production later this year. Neuvo is however optimistic, observing that GPRS will have to have comparable battery performance to existing systems, because customers wouldn't accept any less. Which we presume is where the elves come in...

"Operators and firms that adopt HSCSD this year will enjoy first-mover advantages, while riskier network technologies like Enhanced Data Rate for GSM Evolution (EDGE) will fade away, and UMTS will arrive late."

wirelessdesignonline.com.

European Report Say Higher Mobile Speeds Will be Late

3/24/2000 Despite the hype surrounding higher mobile speeds, European
managers may have to wait longer than they think for 2.5 and 3G solutions,
according to a new report from Amsterdam-based Forrester Research B.V.

The report outlines how companies must act on new mobile opportunities to serve
customers better, strengthen ties with partners, and boost internal productivity
while hedging their bets on shaky technologies. "Hype from vendors like Nokia and
operators like Orange says that European firms will get 2 Mbps speeds on mobile
devices and connect anywhere at anytime?all by 2002," explains Lars Godell,
analyst for Forrester Research B.V. "The reality is that gradual, uneven bandwidth
upgrades will creep along through 2007 and only city areas will see 2 Mbps
speeds by 2007."

Forrester believes that Europe's high-speed mobile future will be enabled by a
series of new mobile network technologies like General Packet Radio Service
(GPRS) and Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS). These
technologies will transform the way corporations serve customers, reach business
partners, and communicate internally -- but only after they are widely standardized
and implemented.

"To increase mobile speeds and global connectivity, new technologies are being
developed, including always-on packet-switched connections and Bluetooth, a
short-range radio technology that allows high-speed communication between
devices and networks," added Godell. "The benefits these technologies offer will
arrive later than promised for a number of reasons, mainly because operators will
not be able to justify the huge investments needed to build an entirely new mobile
network. Shaky standards and incompatible handsets will also give early adopters
a bumpy ride."

Forrester believes that only technologies requiring minimal upgrades to existing
networks and handsets, like High-Speed Circuit Switched Data (HSCSD), GPRS,
and Bluetooth, will see widespread adoption before 2005. Operators and firms
that adopt HSCSD this year will enjoy first-mover advantages, while riskier network
technologies like Enhanced Data Rate for GSM Evolution (EDGE) will fade away,
and UMTS will arrive late.

For the Report "Mobile's High-Speed Hurdles," Forrester spoke with 47 corporate
IT managers as well as 46 mobile operators, telecommunications equipment
suppliers, software houses, and systems integrators. When asked when they will
roll out high-speed mobile data services as part of their business, 53% of
executives interviewed said that it would depend on market readiness, while 19%
said that they might not use it.

Additional information this and other reports from Forrester Research can be
found at www.forrester.com.

Lucent Technologies and QUALCOMM Complete First Wireless High-Speed 153 Kbps Packet Data Call Compliant with 3rd Generation CDMA Standard

- Demonstration of cdma2000 1x High-Speed Data Transmission is Precursor to Verizon Wireless Pilot Project Scheduled in June -

Whippany, N.J. -- April 25, 2000 -- Edging closer towards bringing to market standards-compliant third generation (3G) wireless solutions to deliver the "mobile" Internet, Lucent Technologies (NYSE: LU) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (Nasdaq: QCOM) today announced that their collaboration on 3G wireless data technology has successfully yielded the first live transmissions of over-the-air data using cdma2000-1x technology.

In compliance with the 3G cdma2000-1x standard, known as IS-2000, 153 kilobits per second (kbps) transmission was demonstrated with a streaming video application.

This faster data rate will give mobile phone users the ability to use their handsets to access a range of high-speed, data-rich applications that will include web browsing, streaming video and audio, web teleconferencing and other new, emerging data applications. This compares to current North American wireless data networking speeds ranging from 9.6 kbps to 14.4 kbps, which can only support text-based messages and information.

Verizon Wireless, a wireless provider recently formed by the combination of the U.S. wireless businesses of Bell Atlantic Corp. and Vodafone AirTouch plc, will implement the technology as part of a pilot test bed beginning in June.

"This demonstration is proof that CDMA provides the most cost-efficient, graceful evolution to 3G services, exceeding all other competing digital standards," said Bill Stone, executive director network planning for Verizon Wireless. "We look forward to conducting field trials this summer with Lucent, device manufacturers and content providers. Our plan is to make these data access speeds available to customers sometime next year."

In addition to proving data transmission rates that are nearly ten-fold greater than what is available on North American mobile networks today, the Lucent-QUALCOMM collaboration provides wireless network operators with a solution that effectively doubles the voice capacity of their Lucent-supplied networks. The network upgrades involve only circuit card replacements and a software upgrade without the need for new base stations.

The key improvement in achieving this industry milestone is made possible by using QUALCOMM CDMA Technologies' CSM5000? Cell Station Modem (CSM?) in Lucent Flexent? base stations. The new CSM5000 chip and system software speeds up digital signal processing and supports the new 3G 1x Physical Layer standard while preserving existing radio frequency (RF) components. Also used in this live system demonstration was QUALCOMM's 3G 1x Mobile Handset Development Platform featuring the MSM5000? chipset and system software.

"With QUALCOMM providing our enabling technology, we're proving that Lucent is ahead of the pack in bringing the benefits of next-generation networking to market," said Bill Wiberg, president of Lucent's cellular and PCS Networks. "Our Flexent wireless networks are easily upgradeable by carriers planning for greater capacity and faster transmission speeds for their mobile Internet service. We are responding to our customers' requirements to protect current investment while offering evolutionary improvements that are compatible with their existing networks."

Commenting on the speed with which Lucent and QUALCOMM completed their integration project, Don Schrock, president of QUALCOMM CDMA Technologies, said: "We're delighted by the excellent teamwork and execution that has so rapidly produced a proven solution that's ready to be deployed in Lucent's high-quality base station systems. This outcome stands to reason when world-class leaders in their respective fields join forces in an open, market-driven competition to deliver new solutions to customers."

Lucent and QUALCOMM had demonstrated live over-the-air voice calls on CDMA2000-1x to visiting customers beginning in February, and are now hosting customer visits to showcase their accomplishment with high speed data.

Lucent Technologies, headquartered in Murray Hill, N.J., USA, designs and delivers the systems, software, silicon and services for next-generation communications networks for service providers and enterprises. Backed by the research and development of Bell Labs, Lucent focuses on high-growth areas such as optical and wireless networks; Internet infrastructure; communications software; communications semiconductors and optoelectronics; Web-based enterprise solutions that link private and public networks; and professional network design and consulting services. For more information on Lucent Technologies, visit its Web site at lucent.com.

QUALCOMM CDMA Technologies is the leading developer and supplier of CDMA chipsets, hardware and software solutions, and tools with more than 90 million MSM chips shipped worldwide. The division supplies chipsets to the world's leading CDMA handset and infrastructure manufacturers.

QUALCOMM Incorporated (www.qualcomm.com) is a leader in developing and delivering innovative digital wireless communications products and services based on the Company's CDMA digital technology. The Company's business areas include integrated CDMA chipsets and system software; technology licensing; Eudora© email software for Windows© and Macintosh© computing platforms; satellite-based systems including portions of the Globalstar? system and wireless fleet management systems, OmniTRACS© and OmniExpress?. QUALCOMM owns patents which are essential to all of the CDMA wireless communications standards that have been adopted or proposed for adoption by standards-setting bodies worldwide. QUALCOMM has licensed its essential CDMA patent portfolio to more than 75 telecommunications equipment manufacturers worldwide. Headquartered in San Diego, Calif., QUALCOMM is included in the S&P 500 Index and is a 2000 FORTUNE 500© company traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market© under the ticker symbol QCOM.

QUALCOMM SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT: Except for the historical information contained herein, this news release contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties, including timely product development, the Company's ability to successfully manufacture significant quantities of CDMA or other equipment on a timely and profitable basis, and those related to performance guarantees, change in economic conditions of the various markets the Company serves, as well as the other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's SEC reports, including the report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 26, 1999, and most recent Form 10-Q.

###

Flexent is a trademark of Lucent Technologies, Inc. QUALCOMM, OmniTRACS and Eudora are registered trademarks and OmniExpress is a trademark of QUALCOMM Incorporated. CSM, CSM5000 and MSM5000 are trademarks of QUALCOMM Incorporated. Globalstar is a trademark of Loral QUALCOMM Satellite Services, Incorporated. IS-2000 is a trademark of the Telecommunications Industry Association. Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corp. Macintosh is a registered trademark of Apple Computer Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.



To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (4479)6/9/2000 9:23:00 PM
From: Kent Rattey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5853
 
5 years.....

"At first, the W-CDMA system will only offer limited
coverage, so we?ll still be operating a big PDC
network and we will work towards integrating these
two systems for better efficiency. We know it?s
going to take a while to actually migrate our
subscribers from the old network to the new. We?re
going to take at least five years to do it but
hopefully we?ll be able to accomplish it in not more
than five years, but the actual time required is really
not known."

W-CDMA researcher points out some limits.
JohnG
telecomasia.net
October 1998

Planning next century?s wireless
network: 3G, 4G and beyond

NTT DoCoMo is not only the world?s largest
wireless operator ? it also owns the second
largest wireless research lab in the world. And
that lab is currently spearheading the push for
W-CDMA: a technology which should open up
capacity and dramatically increase the
functionality of mobile networks in the 21st
Century

In this interview with Telecom Asia journalist
Swee-han Yap, Dr. Kohei Satoh, who heads the
W-CDMA research team at NTT DoCoMo,
discusses NTT?s plans for its 3G system and a
fourth-generation system down the line.

Why is NTT favoring W-CDMA over its existing
PDC standard?
We have limited spectrum in the 800-MHz and
1.5-GHz frequency band. And with the number of
subscribers already past the 40 million mark, there
is a need to increase capacity quickly. The Ministry
of Post and Telecommunication?s forecast is that in
2000, there will be more than 50 million
subscribers. However, since bandwidth is limited,
Japan tried to introduce new system which utilizes
a new frequency band which provides more
capacity and the target is to provide capacity which
is twice that of the PDC system.

Why choose to upgrade via W-CDMA and not
another technology?
In our discussion with ARIB [Association of Radio
Industries and Business], we discussed the merits
of adopting a TDMA or CDMA system. We finally
decided on a W-CDMA system. What we hope to
achieve with our third-generation mobile
communication network is to adopt W-CDMA as
our radio interface and an evolved GSM system as
our core network. Because GSM is used
world-wide, this is an important step for Japan
since this will facilitate global roaming.

What kind of applications will run on the new
W-CDMA system?
This is an important but difficult question to answer.
Now on PDC, our major services include voice and
data, but only low bit-rate data. So our hope is to
increase the bit rate speed for data transmission
substantially which is especially important for
mobile email and Internet access. Typically, a
subscriber gets 9.6-kbps data but last year we
introduced packet switching for data transfer which
offers up to 24.4-kbps. However our packet-based
data coverage area is limited.
We?re not quite decided on what new services are
going to be introduced but our top priority is to
provide high-speed mobile Internet. Full-motion
video is also in our target list. But we?re still in the
discussion stage about the kind of applications
we?re going to introduce on the W-CDMA system.

Why is high-speed Internet access such a
priority?
Now, we can only provide 9.6-kbps transmission
rates but user demand is much higher than that. In
Japanese offices, customers get 1-Mbps or
2-Mbps transfer rates but with a handset they can
only get 9.6 kbps, which is quite limited.

What are the advantages of using W-CDMA?
It?s a very promising technology for multimedia
services. It uses variable rate processing
techniques, which means it could easily achieve
multi-rate transmission. The technology?s use of a
wider bandwidth means it can transmit full-motion
video in addition to voice, data and still images.
Because the transmitted data is spread over a
wide band, W-CDMA reduces the effects of
interference, noise and changes in received power
compared to current mobile technologies. The
high-quality data transmission and high frequency
efficiency is similar with what?s available on ISDN
networks. It also eliminates the complexity of
system configurations. This means that even when
transmitting large volumes of data, it can avoid
complex system configurations which cuts down
the cost of transmission.

How far does NTT hope to take W-CDMA?
Our target, as discussed with the ITU, is to take
indoor transmission rates up to 2 Mbps and
outdoor transmission up to 384 kbps. 384 kbps is
the optimum transmission speed for pedestrian
users while 144 kbps is for users traveling in
fast-moving vehicles.

Do you plan to abandon your PDC network
and go straight to W-CDMA in 2000?
No, we?re planning to continue running both the
W-CDMA network and the PDC network for awhile.
At first, the W-CDMA system will only offer limited
coverage, so we?ll still be operating a big PDC
network and we will work towards integrating these
two systems for better efficiency. We know it?s
going to take a while to actually migrate our
subscribers from the old network to the new. We?re
going to take at least five years to do it but
hopefully we?ll be able to accomplish it in not more
than five years, but the actual time required is really
not known.

Do you think migrating from the PDC to
W-CDMA technology is going to be a difficult
process?
Yes, I think so. First of all, there is the problem of
migrating from TDMA-based PDC which operates
on 800 MHz and 1.5 GHz to CDMA-based
W-CDMA which runs on 2.2 GHz. There is also the
different bit rate, which is going to complicate
matters. The two technologies utilize different
transmission and switching schemes. We?re going
to move into ATM-based switching for our
W-CDMA system which is quite different from
what?s used on the PDC network.

What kind of handsets are going to be used
on the W-CDMA network?
We?re going to introduce voice handsets similar to
those used on PDC. For high bit-rate data
transmission, there will be the new videophones.
We?re also planning to introduce dual-mode
phones which will operate on both PDC and
W-CDMA systems. I personally believe dual-mode
terminals will be an important step towards
migrating the PDC subscribers to the new
W-CDMA network.

Do you feel Japan is disadvantaged in the
telecom research arena because GSM or
D-AMPS technologies are used in other parts
of the world?
No, I don?t see that as being a problem. For
instance, on the IMT-2000 issue, we have good
working relationships with R&D labs of different
telcos and manufacturers locally as well as abroad,
especially in Europe where there are multiple
operators in each market and different
manufacturing companies. Domestically, we
discuss with manufacturers ways to improve the
PDC technology and work together to develop new
services for PDC.
Do you think worldwide deployment of 3G networks
is going to be difficult since some of the 3G
spectrum is already used for 1.9-GHz PCS
networks?
I think this is only true for the U.S. Half of its
allocated IMT-2000 band is used up for PCS
systems. But the US used the wider portion of its
IMT-2000 band for PCS, leaving its less wide
portion free for 3G systems. And global roaming
requires the less wide band anyway. So that does
not present a problem.

What are NTT?s fourth-generation plans?
We plan to introduce a fourth generation system by
2010. It used to be one generation spanned a
decade but now each generation only takes five
years. There are plans to introduce broadband
ISDN in our fourth-generation system and
introducing data transmission speeds up to 10
Mbps. We would like to use a higher frequency
band in our fourth-generation system which could
be microwave or millimeter wave band. So we?re
currently doing research on frequency band
technology and the feasibility of running a higher
frequency band system.

What do you see as important wireless trends
in Japan?
I think there are three key words: multimedia,
personal and global. Multimedia or mobile data will
be an important trend. Subscribers will send more
emails, images, and video. The cellular handset will
increasingly become a consumer-market product
and not one just for corporate people. The PDC
service is only for Japan which is quite a limited
area. We see the next generation of mobile
communication networks to be ones that adopt a
global standard which will enable roaming on a
world-wide scale and we hope that will be
W-CDMA. This is going to be quite important in
Japan especially for people who travel widely for
business. Now when we go to South Korea, we
need CDMA phones, and when we go to India or
Singapore we need GSM terminals. With the
adoption of a global standard, we will be able to
use one terminal world-wide.



To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (4479)6/13/2000 11:13:00 PM
From: cfoe  Respond to of 5853
 
what difference does the timing of EDGE make anyway if DoCoMo plans WCDMA for March 2001, 8 months from now?

Per DoCoMo it will roll out W-CDMA in May, 2001, not March 2001. And if this is going to be a true roll out of a
W-CDMA system (instead of some relatively small, local "test" deployment), then we should start hearing about infrastructure equipment shipping in quantity by this fall (the source for this is the head of LU's wireless group, the only non-Japanese infra supplier working with DoCoMo).

So in a few months we should start to know the truth.