Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CNBC -- critique. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: swisstrader who wrote (5895)	6/8/2000 2:41:00 PM
From: Jim S	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17683

nor do they have some dopey group called the NRA who still don't seem to get it. Get what? Please explain your comment.

To: swisstrader who wrote (5895)	6/8/2000 2:43:00 PM
From: Sarkie	Respond to of 17683

Once again, you are making a fool out of yourself here. You both are!!

To: swisstrader who wrote (5895)	6/8/2000 3:34:00 PM
From: Gary M. Reed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17683

Your assumption about gun control preventing what happened at Columbine is a total joke. And proof-positive evidence that you do not possess the ability to fully think through your positions. Do you mean to tell me that had firearms not been available to these two scumbags, that nothing would've happened? So in other words, without guns, these two would've went on to be fine young men. Give me a break... Without guns, they would've used pipe bombs, malotov cocktails, knives, etc. When someone is deranged enough to want to kill someone, they will find a way. Blaming the guns is a joke. Blame their parents who obviously failed to teach these punks anything about values. I suppose you also think that gun control will keep semi-automatic weapons out of the hands of the thug street drugdealers too. Dream on.