Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : 2000:The Make-or-Break Election -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: truthful who wrote (155)	6/8/2000 5:25:00 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Respond to of 1013

Fair enough. But I thought I had read that Gore had more money in his coffers than Bush at this point. I know both parties have been shaking the money trees pretty fiercely as of late. So I don't think being well-financed is going to be the determinant of the best recipient to vote for. They are both for sale, and by election time will be bought and paid for several times over. It's called democracy, if I recall correctly.

To: truthful who wrote (155)	6/8/2000 5:29:00 PM
From: Carolyn	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1013

I am disappointed that this thread's direction has turned from the issues at hand, instead deteriorating into insults to the posters. IMO, Bush and Gore will be the candidates who get the most votes next November. We should discuss their merits and demerits. I am a conservative, and agree with c.horn. Bush may not be ideal - who is? - and I prefer his values and positions to those of Gore. Gore seems to be a changeling who took lessons from his current boss and his father; if one wants more Clinton, vote for Gore. You won't be disappointed.