Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James Clarke who wrote (10705)	6/8/2000 11:08:00 PM
From: BWAC	Respond to of 78744

<PG still has 20 points of downside to come. > I sure do hate to bash a down stock. But I agree, for your very same reasons. Why was this ever trading at a PE of 50 plus? I'm not confident enough to short it, but low 40's is where it would get my attention to start buying.

To: James Clarke who wrote (10705)	6/9/2000 12:10:00 PM
From: TwoBear	Respond to of 78744

MAXS finally moves on increase on earnings and order backlog attributed to better then expected acceptance of their new Anne Klein line. Scott

To: James Clarke who wrote (10705)	6/9/2000 12:18:00 PM
From: Grantcw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78744

Hello James, I agree with your thoughts on PG. Some of those Dow stocks are still way overvalued, more overvalued than some of the Nasdaq high-fliers, imo (not the dot-coms, but companies like QCOM, CREE, etc... but that's another thread). Anyways, I noticed that you are an avid follower of SNH. I was wondering if you've done a comparison between SNH and HRP (its parent) to determine the relative valuations of the companies? Is it possible that HRP is a better buy at these levels? Thanks, cw