Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lml who wrote (7273)	6/9/2000 7:19:00 AM
From: MikeM54321	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12823

lml- Afraid I have to plead ignorance on both fronts. Your Time Domain reference and your FCTF thread comment about backhaul charges to the RT. I've never heard of Time Domain until just now, and I don't know the details of FCC co-location rules concerning driving fiber deeper into the neighborhood. Sorry. -MikeM(From Florida)

To: lml who wrote (7273)	6/9/2000 9:25:00 AM
From: axial	Respond to of 12823

Hi,iml - Re: UWB Message 13773751 Regards. Jim

To: lml who wrote (7273)	6/9/2000 12:15:00 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Respond to of 12823

Hi lml, I've heard from reliable sources that Time Domain has a viable technology and the the company is getting some good VC support. The major hurdle has been on the regulatory front. There's a lot of concern on the part of DoD and the FAA among others as to the impact of UWB on GPS system performance. Applications, such as short range radar for law enforcement and disaster recovery applications are currently moving forward. The possibilities for this technology in the communications arena seem quite good, from the research I've done. I regard the involvement of US West as being a net plus to the company in the Beltropolis battles that have held back the commercial development of the technology. Best, Ray