SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ron Mitchell who wrote (53496)6/9/2000 8:32:00 AM
From: Kip518  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
the '87 stock market crash was not followed by a recession

Ron, not quite true. The Northeast U.S., because of its dependence on financial institutions & the stock market as business, went immediately into a recession. It took almost 10 years for the real estate prices to recover to pre-crash levels. Granted the rest of the country did not suffer as badly. However, I agree, that it will be different this time.



To: Ron Mitchell who wrote (53496)6/9/2000 8:56:00 AM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Ron Mitchell, the crash of 87 as I remember off the top of my
head was not caused by interest rate hikes but rather
by Government " talk " ( by Sen.Mitchell? and Reagan's side
kick Baker )to start protectionist trade fees.

This time we are looking at a slowing economy with
slowing earnings
.If earnings are disappointing
is the market going to go up?

TA

Message #53496 from Ron Mitchell at Jun 9, 2000 6:24 AM ET
Tunica, the '87 stock market crash was not followed by a recession. A recession later this year is a distinct possibility, but not a certainty.



To: Ron Mitchell who wrote (53496)6/9/2000 9:14:00 AM
From: bobby beara  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
>>>>the '87 stock market crash was not followed by a recession. A recession later this year is a distinct possibility, but not a certainty.<<<<

not immediately, but it was an indicator of a topping business cycle, which peaked in 1989.



To: Ron Mitchell who wrote (53496)6/9/2000 10:53:00 AM
From: marginmike  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
yes it was but occured in 1990. The crash's effects took 2 years to take hold.