Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (53513)	6/9/2000 9:15:00 AM
From: UnBelievable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

We Don't Want the Facts to Get in the Way of a Good Story

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (53513)	6/9/2000 9:56:00 AM
From: Tunica Albuginea	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

heinz: OF COURSE we CAN use the Surplus to pay for more Social Security spending. After all that IS the Clinton/Gore Democratic election agenda. This will have several beneficial effects on maintaining Democrats tax and spend philosophy growing: The main one being that we don't have to cut spending. we get a false reassurance that the debt is coming down. ( it will not if economy/Naz cool and surplus/tax receipts fall, TA Message #53513 from heinz blasnik at Jun 9, 2000 8:56 AM ET TA, LOL! how 'bout using the 'surplus'. i read on bloomberg that PPI was unchanged due to 'lower energy costs' - what are these guys at BLS smoking? anybody still doubting they cook the numbers, hmm? regards, hb