Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : 2000:The Make-or-Break Election -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rachelsmith who wrote (194)	6/9/2000 10:50:00 AM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1013

Rachel, Good morning. Interesting critique of Mr. Bush as a candidate lacking in basic grammar skills ("slaughtering the English language"; "serious language problems"; "hasn't mastered his native language"). Perhaps you would like to engage in a grammar exercise for the education of the thread. Please identify the error in the following sentence: Bush happens to the bigger moron of the two, but whose counting (certainly not Bush). (I cut and pasted it from your post.) Have a nice day. ; )

To: rachelsmith who wrote (194)	6/9/2000 10:50:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1013

Thanks for that classic "lawdog", you have been "outed".

To: rachelsmith who wrote (194)	6/9/2000 12:04:00 PM
From: haqihana	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1013

RS, You state your demented opinions as if they were facts. You don't know nearly as much as you like to put on. Those that think their opinions are not to be questioned, soon lose their credibility on any thread. You will soon do so. I have worked with, lived with, eaten with, and played with Mexicans for most of my life. Even those who grew up speaking the language misspeak at times. If you think that is moronic, then you are the moron. Bush speaks straight American and refrains from using the "high falutin'" words of those like gore, who use longer, and fancier, words prepared for him, to attempt to appear to be something he is not. IMO, that is a clear indication that Bush is the far more honest candidate. If you look at any election in terms of comedic value, then you are proving that you are, indeed, the fool you appear to be. You can laugh at Bush if you want to, but if your life depends on him losing the election, it might kill you. ~H~