Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Piffer OT - And Other Assorted Nuts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (38252)	6/9/2000 12:40:00 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 63513

Ya know, nobody like to start a little thread fire more than me but you take the cake. I can't speak for the thread but I personally wish you would become your SI name. You offer nothing and deliver less.

To: long-gone who wrote (38252)	6/9/2000 12:48:00 PM
From: Lost1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 63513

Harassment case reversed on meaning of `obscene' austin360.com

To: long-gone who wrote (38252)	6/9/2000 12:51:00 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 63513

A complex issue. I believe that a woman (or a man) has the right to do with or to their body as they wish. This means that I believe that it is an individual decision whether or not one takes illegal drugs, drinks, smokes, prostitutes themselves, etc... This does not mean that I think that these are good and healthy things for people to do, just that I have no right to tell them not to unless it is interfering with my right to life my life as I choose. I think that the laws should focus on where peoples rights are being violated (driving under the influence for example). In the case of prostitution, if the woman has not been coerced into the profession I don't believe I have the right to say that she can't do it. My understanding is that many in the Southeast Asian countries are essentially indentured servants or what amounts to slaves. I think that this falls under a completely different legal and ethical category.