Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: miraje who wrote (46332)	6/9/2000 2:00:00 PM
From: TTOSBT	Respond to of 74651

Thanks James. It's sad the government (goons) had such an agenda! TTOSBT

To: miraje who wrote (46332)	6/9/2000 2:14:00 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Thanks for posting the article James. Even more interesting since it was published April 5, and here we are 3 months later, and many millions/billions of dollars down....I think we would all do well to periodically review this article, and see just how accurate it is and will be.... In particular the last four paragraphs, with the best and the worst.... KLP

To: miraje who wrote (46332)	6/9/2000 4:52:00 PM
From: TigerPaw	Respond to of 74651

I wonder how much of our revenues go to fund these "independant" commentaries? TP

To: miraje who wrote (46332)	6/9/2000 5:00:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Excellent commentary, as was James Glassman's in the WSJ. Both made similar points about the Clinton's regime's reckless intrusion of government into high tech, the 1/2 trillion in loses so far and the far-reaching negative consequences their actions. Perhaps if Gates had rented the Lincoln bedroom a few times like Ted Turner or hosted one of AlGore's Buddhist temple fundraisers then MSFT would have had protection. I believe Gates intimated as much. So much for regrets, at this point we can only cheer him on.