Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: .Trev who wrote (25932)	6/9/2000 5:25:00 PM
From: Lorne	Respond to of 26850

.Trev - Wrong! When you buy shares in a company you most certainly do have the right to inject your opinions. That's why you are allowed to go to the AGM and take a turn at the microphone. That's why you can phone the company and register your approval or lack thereof. That's why you can go on SI and complain about Turner and anything else associated with the company. They solicit people like us and then want us to go away after we buy. Well some don't play it that way and it is their right to do so if they are a minority shareholder.

To: .Trev who wrote (25932)	6/9/2000 5:26:00 PM
From: ddl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

That's the altruistic way of looking at things. Personally, I'm from the old school and pp are taken down to make money first, company strength second. Something like the home renovator/flipper who makes his profit on closing a "handyman special" deal, then can sell for breakeven. Profit is made before the deal is cooked. But then, what do I know, my broker doesn't come running to me with cheap stock.