Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Birim Goldfields Inc. (BGI-T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russwinter who wrote (582)	6/10/2000 12:05:00 PM
From: russwinter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 922

Think I found in part the answer to my 581 question. From BGI annual describing Tombe-Parabu: "Contrary to what is typically found on the Ashanti Belt, this anomaly (and several others on BUI) is deficient in arsenic, indicating unlikely presence of arsenopyrite but shows a positive sodium response, in line with the regionally recognized sodium trend." I believe that is geologyspeak for, "There's sand and gravel to deal with", and that's good for processing and reclamation purposes. Also I averaged out the drill results and it's 2.56 grams per 2.4 m intercept, all near surface (under 40m). So I see this as an encouraging start. I assume they will be looking for and need wider intercepts? I wonder how the geology at Bui compares with the next reef zone to the south called the Sewfi being developed by Normandy and Moydow (another promising situation, just picked up shares @ 95 cents)? Grades there are about the same, but very wide intercepts. If anybody cares to look. moydow.com