Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : About that Cuban boy, Elian -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (7264)	6/9/2000 8:53:00 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9127

But I think it's important to keep in mind that religious organizations also do a lot to help feed the poor and disadvantaged. Good for them for cleaning up after themselves. If all children were wanted, loved, and properly raised, there would be fewer people like substance abusers who needed that help. Would we really be concerned about population levels if every nation had a standard of living comparable to the United States, Japan or Germany? Probably not. Once again, Absolutely YES. There's not enough elbow room now. And we're running the pandas and the tigers right off the planet as we spread out. For shame! Karen

To: greenspirit who wrote (7264)	6/9/2000 9:13:00 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9127

I think you might be very surprised, and more than a little shocked, at the way the institutional Catholic Church behaves in countries where it has real political influence. I'm not suggesting that these countries would be better off without the church, but I think the church should take a serious look at some of its positions and activities, and at their practical results. An example: the Catholic Church in the Philippines has succeeded in keeping divorce illegal. This has not stopped families from breaking up, but it has made it almost impossible for women and children to make any enforceable claims on the men who leave them. The result is quite predictable. I understand the church's position that the bond should be eternal. But it is the church's place to deal with absolutes, and the State's to deal with practical realities, and it seems more than a bit churlish for the church to use its political clout to prevent the State from addressing the issue of broken families. I do not see how returning a child to his father constitutes jumping into bed with the leader of the country where the child's father lives. If the Germans returned the children of that American father, would they be jumping into bed with Clinton? If anything, Castro came out the loser. Every Cuban has seen that even a Communist father can get a fair hearing in an American court, and don't think that won't provide some food for thought. It would have been much better for Castro, from a propaganda perspective (and what else is this all about?) if we had said "screw you, the kid stays". Castro would have been able to whip up enough hate over that to distract attention from domestic issues for a good long time.