Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Allan Harris who wrote (14365)	6/11/2000 8:49:00 PM
From: Justa Werkenstiff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15132

Allan: Re: "You chose to respond to my original post" Yeah, sure did. What would happen if I did not? Or didn't you think it through? No, I do not think you thought it through. Go back and look at the history of this thread. Re: "You chose to chastise me for some perceived transgression of decorum." What a joke. There is no "perceived" trangression. It is an "actual" trangression. You know it all too well. You probably knew it was a trangression before you did it. You knew it after even in your vain attempt to say that it fit the heading of this thread. How many times have we been through this same issue, Allan? A half dozen? Deal with the facts. Your post was off topic and inflamatory. "Rat bastards", "hacks", "idiots" and more. Give me a break and give yourself a time out. You posted it anyway because you decided your need to express yourself outweighed my request to not discuss political subjects regarding Clinton. And your post was in poor taste regardless. Re: "You chose to question my sobriety and despite your denial, not in a "jocular" manner." Boy, you are so out of touch. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I really am. Believe what you wish. I thought you would pick up on my comment in your usual witty fashion. Guess happy-go-lucky-witty Allan is out of town and someone else is posting under his name. Too bad, everyone loved witty Allan. But you tell me what I am supposed to think of someone who openly flaunts the previously stated requests to keep political discussions off this thread as it pertains to the Clinton Administration? How should I view someone who disdains the use of the words "scum of the earth" as they pertain to one poster but then decides it is okay to call someone an "ibecile", "idiot" and "moron"? I have no idea what to think but any speculation I can make seems unfavorable to you. Re: " Justa, you chose to pick a fight." Nope. You did by making that post to begin with. Deal with it. Was I supposed to let it slip by only to come under criticism from the pro Clinton brigade for being unbiased? Oh, sure, post out of line and let Justa clean it up. I don't care. Let Justa waste his time. So what if he has put in so much time and effort in to this thread. Screw him and his wishes. Hey, isn't Justa the DOJ anyway? He looks like Reno. Fight with yourself and the DOJ and anyone else who happens to come along. I just might agree with you on many of your points but your post was way, way, way out of line.