SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IDTC Options Players (losers and whiners) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carl Smith who wrote (580)6/12/2000 8:52:00 AM
From: md1derful  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 593
 
CS: Unbelievable...I thought I'd never see it!!!
doc



To: Carl Smith who wrote (580)6/15/2000 11:22:00 AM
From: Steve Fancy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 593
 
Sooo, any opinions out there? On the surface, was pretty much what I expected. I did not hear one thing that would convince me to buy this stock yet, as it appears he's doing just what we've speculated. He's asking investors to trust his judgement with all this cash...LOL. Therein lies the problem IMO as I don't believe HJ has pulled off a successful venture since NTOP and the roadside is littered with what, at least a dozen projects he attempted. He has already stated he will not be an inovation leader, but instead will wait for others to prove successful ideas just in time for HJ to jump in and miss the boat.

How much of the IDTC ventures loses are for dead projects, I bet most of it. What companies will he be developing like NTOP? More Brix...LOL. Why is Brix suddenly a dead project. OK no funding through IPO, but that never would have been there anyway IMO. Soo, if it were such a good idea as had been hyped and hyped and hyped, why does HJ not fund it?

Don't know guys, but this guy just seems to get worse. I'm guessing that todays stock movement was just another surge of the ex-hawaii loyal followers who seem to see something that I for the life of me cannot. They seem to feed on each other<g>.

Any other opinions.

Thanks,

sf