SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : LVEN:NASDAQ--Las Vegas Entertainment Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (172)7/24/2000 5:29:04 AM
From: EL KABONG!!!  Respond to of 228
 
kvbc.com

El Rancho back on the Hot Seat:

PART 1

LAS VEGAS, April 24-Anyone who's lived in or visited Las Vegas over the last 8 years
has probably asked this question, what's up with the EL Rancho?
Over the last 9 months, our News 3 Investigators have put El Rancho owners and local
government leaders on the Hot Seat. News 3 Investigator Darcy Spears answers that
question.
You might say it's a miracle but this crumbling old eyesore will soon become a memory in
the blink of an eye. In fact, the county says there have already been inquiries about
implosion permits for this place and the questions are coming from el rancho's neighbor,
who's also the new owner.
There will be cheers when the el rancho comes crashing down, burying 8 years of
mystery in a pile of dust.
Last summer, employees who asked us to conceal their identities took us on the only tour
anyone's ever had of the decaying property. They gave News 3 and the community an eye
opening view of this eyesore, showing us just how bad the place had become since its
doors closed to the public in 1991.
Can you imagine buying a $3 million condo, looking out your window and seeing this
place?
That was the million-dollar question, actually, the $45 million-dollar question. 45 million
dollars is the amount Turnberry executives are paying to purchase the dilapidated El
Rancho property. Apparently, they couldn't imagine selling a high-priced penthouse with
this in its backyard.
Now, Turnberry place residents won't have to overlook El Rancho and that makes County
Commissioner Myrna Williams, whose district encompasses both properties, very happy.
Williams says, “I think we have a miracle and I'm excited and I know lots of other people
are excited and hopefully we don't hit any snags along the way.”
Williams, who just had eye surgery and still has to wear sunglasses for sensitivity, says
when El rancho is imploded, she wants to be there to pull the switch.
Williams says, “The real blight is on its way out…we'll be getting an eyesore off the strip,
we'll be having a very fine property there and it'll just be great for everybody. It'll solve a lot
of problems.”
The problems she's talking about are those we exposed when our investigation first
began.
For example, a chemical room that could kill you, asbestos falling out of the ceilings, and
faulty wiring are some of the problems we exposed.
When county inspectors took a look at the place after seeing our video, Commissioner
Williams sent the county's first-ever contact with El Rancho owners.
In the letter she writes, “I am sure you can understand my deep concern regarding this
property. Foremost the safety of our tourists and workers and secondly the fact that it sits
within our major strip corridor where all gaming properties continually renovate and
upgrade. The property has been vacant for many years. What future plans do you have for
this property and is it possible to expedite the time line for those plans?”
After 8 years sitting, shuttered, our investigation and that letter led to El Rancho's sale
within a few short months.
Williams says, “I wouldn't like to think that people have to be coerced. It's a very valuable
piece of property and I'm sure that they were anxious to solve their problems as well.”
The owner's problems are explained in a letter they sent back to the county.
They talk about why the El Rancho sat for so many years and what they were waiting for.
But local experts and a scorned investor don't buy it.
Escrow on El Rancho's sale could close by the end of this week, or June first at the latest.
Turnberry's not yet saying what their plans are for the property.

PART 2

Turnberry is indeed taking over el rancho but many say the sale should've taken place a
long time ago.
Did it take our investigation and county pressure to light a fire under El Rancho owners'
feet and would they have sold at all if we hadn't turned up the heat?
The folks at Turnberry have their hands full with the new addition to their family, the El
Rancho.
Williams says, “When you have a piece of property that's vacant for as long as that's
been vacant, you end up having problems and squatters and all kinds of things and no
matter how hard you try, there's always something that happens or somebody that can
sneak in.”
Plenty of vagrants were sneaking in and staying at El Rancho, that’s just one of the
hazards we first exposed several months ago when some workers who asked us to
conceal their identities invited us in and showed us around the decaying hotel-casino.
Inside we saw marijuana and empty beer bottles all around as well as rats, roaches and
other nasty things.
Nasty should be turning to nice now that Florida-based Turnberry Co. is purchasing the
property and will probably tear it down to expand their residential presence in Las Vegas.
Williams says, “Rumors are abundant. There have not been any permits pulled. There
have not been any plans turned in yet. This is just the beginning of the deal.’
A deal that was done in a few short months, after the property sat vacant for eight long
years.
Why the sale all of a sudden?
The answer lies with International Thoroughbred Breeders, a New Jersey company that
currently owns the El Rancho. I.T.B. answered the county's recent inquiry about their
plans for the property, sent as a result of our investigation, with a letter that announces the
sale to Turnberry and explains the ultimate failure to make Countryland USA, a reality.
ITB officers claim they were "unsuccessful in raising the funds necessary to renovate and
upgrade the property to the standards which would be appropriate for Las Vegas."
Review-journal columnist John L. Smith who's been writing about El Rancho for years,
doesn't buy it.
Smith says, “We have now passed through a time of unprecedented growth on the strip in
which interest rates nationally are the lowest they've been perhaps in the history of the
strip, where money on Wall Street has been more available than ever for funding of Strip
properties and the El Rancho can't get any money? It tells me something about how the
place is being promoted and maybe about the owners.”
El rancho's former owners have a checkered past at best, especially Las Vegas
Entertainment Network.
Since our investigation aired, they've been under scrutiny by the F-B-I and Securities and
Exchange Commission for allegations of stock scams and investor fraud.
Los Angeles businessman Jack Carlton says he knows about that fraud from personal
experience with L.V.E.N.
Carlton says, “I can't say what happened to my money.” He says he lost his retirement
savings to L.V.E.N. when they failed to deliver a return on his $300,000 investment in
electronic bingo machines to be sold in Brazil.
Carlton says, “It'd mean my retirement. That's the whole thing. At my age, point of
retirement, perhaps I was suckered into a deal that really didn't exist but I just don't believe
that.”
For all the others like Jack Carlton and anyone who may have lost money investing in El
Rancho, there's one thing Commissioner Williams says they can believe, “there will never
be another El Rancho again.”
Escrow on El Rancho's sale could close by the end of this week, or the latest by June 1.
Turnberry's not yet saying what their plans are for the property.
The county plans to ask the 2001 legislature to grant them the power to condemn so they
can affectively address problem properties like el rancho in the future.
Currently, only cities have the legal power to condemn.

KJC



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (172)10/10/2000 3:05:39 PM
From: Arcane Lore  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 228
 
...The US Department of State's 1999 Narcotics Control Strategy Report observes. Even more "remote" are mere figments of fertile imaginations such as the Dominion of Malchizedek [sic] or The Kingdom of Enenkio Atol, both entirely fraudulent in intent and practice. ...

( state.gov )

Are the Kingdom of Enenkio Atol and the Kingdom of Enenkio the same entity? In any event, from today's SEC Digest:

INTERNET OFFERING ACTION FILED AGAINST ROBERT F. MOORE D/B/A THE KINGDOM OF ENENKIO

The Commission filed an action against Robert F. Moore, individually and doing business as The Kingdom of Enenkio, of Honolulu, Hawaii. The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, alleges that Moore, a resident of Honolulu, Hawaii, is holding himself out to be the head of State of The Kingdom of Enenkio. The complaint alleges that Moore is currently conducting a $1 billion offering of "Enenkio Gold War bonds" on an Internet Web site (www.Enenkio.org), through e-mail solicitations sent worldwide, and in postings to various Internet bulletin boards. Enenkio asserts ancestral tribunal rights to Wake Island and atolls in the Marshall Islands chain and claims an intention to develop its territories. According to the complaint, the Kingdom of Enenkio is not recognized in any international forum as a sovereign state nor is it a corporate or statutory entity. The complaint alleges that Moore's offering materials represent that the bonds will pay a compound interest rate of ten percent after 5 years. The complaint also alleges that Moore represents that the bonds are "backed by gold reserves, guarantees, real property or other assets." However, according to the complaint, Moore has no gold reserves and no security, real property or otherwise, exists for the bonds. The complaint further alleges that the bonds have not been registered with the Commission and no exemption for registration applies.

Judge Susan Mollway granted an emergency temporary restraining order against Moore. Judge Mollway's order enjoined Moore from violating the antifraud and securities registration provisions of the federal securities laws, required Moore to provide an accounting, and froze Moore's assets pending determination of the matter on the merits. [SEC v. Robert F. Moore, individually and d/b/a The Kingdom of Enenkio, No. CV-0000651-SOM, D. Haw.] (LR-16758)


sec.gov