Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: willcousa who wrote (53744)	6/12/2000 11:41:00 AM
From: pater tenebrarum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

OT...that's certainly the contrarian position to take. pre-emptive global warming efforts to forestall the global cooling expected to result from future meteorite hits...LOL!

To: willcousa who wrote (53744)	6/12/2000 12:37:00 PM
From: Casaubon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

OT Your narrow focus on temperature fluctuations belies your ignorance of the subject on which you speak. It is the loss of the ozone layer, which serves to capture dangerous UV radiation, that underlies the dangers to the ecosystem. The lack of UV capture results in a destruction of phytoplankton respondible fo the vast majority of O2 synthesis. The increased incidence of UV radiation also serves as a magor source of damage to genetic material necessary for the replication of ALL life forms on the planet. And, contrary to popular science fiction, genetic mutations do not lead to the evolution of funny, pizza eating, super-competant reptiles, capable of solving all problems through the ancient techniques of martial artists. <ggg>