SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike Buckley who wrote (26224)6/12/2000 8:02:00 PM
From: Apollo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Sandisk...

the value chain that is getting stronger and stronger. My comment is that the strength of the value chain says a lot about the IPR. Some of the companies in the value chain are huge. They're in a position to develop the technology on their own or at least to do a joint venture. But they're not. When I think that Microsoft chose to pay Gemstar instead of develop the technology on their own, that speaks volumes about Gemstar's IPR to my ears. I also believe that might be the case about SanDisk's value chain.

--Mike Buckley


Precisely.

In 1999, I would have needed you and UF and LB to say this over and over, even though I RTFM twice.

But I actually stumbled to this one without you this time......and drew exactly all of the same analogies.

I haven't concentrated on software plays, like SEBL and Citrix, and ITWO, not because they aren't terrific, but because I have always been mesmerized by the TFM's comment about vast riches related to enabling hardware.

Looking forward to your participation.

Apollo



To: Mike Buckley who wrote (26224)6/12/2000 8:40:00 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Mike, in regard to the SNDK patents, the earlier ones have been tested at least by the Department of Commerce, which banned imports of flash chips by Samsung unless Samsung made a licensing agreement with SNDK. That action took place about three years ago and really sent a message to companies involved in flash memory that SNDK had some genuine IPR. The only company that didn't listen too closely was Lexar, which is headed by a former SNDK employee.

It's true that until the new plant in Manassas, VA starts up (the joint venture with Toshiba), SNDK might be considered a fab-less company specializing in design, not manufacturing. However, it is also true that SNDK had purchased about 49 percent ownership in a Taiwan plant that subsequently was bought by Taiwan Semiconductor. SNDK exchanged its shares in the old company for shares in Taiwan Semi. While SNDK may not have an active role in running the company, they do have a claim on its output, as owners and customers.

Just a few thoughts. I'm new to this board; came here on the suggestion of Apollo and am interested in sharing ideas about some of these companies.

Art



To: Mike Buckley who wrote (26224)6/12/2000 8:50:00 PM
From: djweiland  Respond to of 54805
 
for all sandisk experts: I've seen several forcasts that call for near term overproduction capacity for flash memory IC within two years. Obviously this could have significant impact on sandisk. can any of you educate me to this risk??? thanks djw