SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave B who wrote (44249)6/13/2000 1:32:00 PM
From: Joe NYC  Respond to of 93625
 
Dave,

And how long will current processor speeds remain current processor speeds?

In case of 1 GHz Pentium III, that processor speed has yet to become current.

You may think RDRAM is ahead of the curve, but how bad would the transition have been for Intel if they had waited until RDRAM was really needed and then tried to cut it in (given the chipset/ramping problems we've seen with the new technology)? Better to get the bugs worked out before it's really required.

Good point. I think Intel showed real commitment to RDRAM when it bet the mainstream and performance chipsets on RDRAM. It was a clear message to the DRAM industry: You either produce RDRAM, or I will shoot myself.

Joe



To: Dave B who wrote (44249)6/13/2000 1:51:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Dave,


LOL! Nice backpedaling!


I have been arguing on SI for over two years now that the current problem with DRAM is latency rather than bandwidth. I'm rather surprised to hear someone suggest that I am backpeddling on this issue.

Here is a recent post I made concerning the need for high bandwidth memory.

To: pompsander who wrote (43953)
From: Scumbria
Saturday, Jun 10, 2000 2:25 PM ET
Reply # of 44255

Pomp,

I expect 2GHz by early 2002. The requirements for DRAM bandwidth will exceed what SDRAM can provide, and a different solution will be required.

The question then becomes, DRDRAM, DDR, or something else? I am not very familiar with the electrical noise issues discussed on the thread, and rely on the information presented by others.

I hope that this forum will provide me with some information towards this end. At some point in the not too distant future, I will have to make this decision for a design, and would like to make the correct choice.

Regards,
Scumbria


Message 13862068

Scumbria



To: Dave B who wrote (44249)6/13/2000 3:19:00 PM
From: jim kelley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Dave,

Good take on the issue of when to begin the switchover to RDRAM. Looks to me that INTEL is very timely on this part of the execution of the switchover. There needs to be ample supply of reasonably priced RDRAM by the time Willamette is introduced. JMO