Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mozek who wrote (46555)	6/13/2000 4:18:00 PM
From: Charles Tutt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

How can he stay the relief based on an appeal that doesn't yet exist? Suppose Microsoft filed a motion for reconsideration instead of an appeal. Then what sense would it make to have stayed?

To: mozek who wrote (46555)	6/13/2000 8:21:00 PM
From: David Howe	Respond to of 74651

<< Jackson is making moves that make sense only as tactics to be used by a plaintiff, not standard procedure for an impartial judge working within the system. In fact, they were scripted by the DOJ. >> Absolutely correct and this has been apparent for quite some time now. The 'findings of fact' made this glaringly obvious. The 'findings of fact' were basically written by the hand of the DOJ. It's that obvious. Jackson will fall. He will be removed from any further trials on this matter at his level. The appeals court will remove him from further involvement due to bias and going beyond his authorized boundaries. Of this I'm quite certain, but this is only my opinion. Dave