SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LLCF who wrote (54250)6/14/2000 12:12:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116759
 
David, clearly you love to argue solely for the sake of arguing, casting far more heat than light upon any issue.

The argument was between Richard and myself. Unless you can document where I have erred, it would probably benefit you to be silent and thought a fool, than to continuously open your mouth and removing all doubt.

If you had bothered to reread the thread Richard and myself left in debating this stupid friggin' issue, you would have found that Richard stated the issue about reducing hedging in this post:

Message 13872949

To which I responded with this post:

Message 13873198

Then Richard countered with his mistaken conclusion about Ashanti's hedge position being eliminated:

Message 13873358

Then Richard twisted my words by claiming that I "agreed" that Ashanti had reduced it's hedge, when I clearly had not stated that:

Message 13873947

To which I responded with this:

siliconinvestor.com

To which you opted to open your trap and call me a putz, when the real putz was the one who didn't have his facts straight...

Namely You.



To: LLCF who wrote (54250)6/14/2000 12:26:00 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116759
 
<<Ron, please read the above again... jeez you're a putz sometimes.>>

I don't understand your use of the word "sometimes".