Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (81677)	6/14/2000 9:07:00 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

Better not to make decisions that are irreversible when such finality is unnecessary and extremely and inefficiently costly, imo.

To: Neocon who wrote (81677)	6/14/2000 9:17:00 AM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

In either case, despite care, a death was inadvertently caused. Not true. An execution can never be a death inadvertently caused. Nobody drives a car intending to kill; all executions are intended to kill. If execution was demonstrably necessary, or if there were some measurable practical benefit to be gained by it, one might think it sufficiently important to justify the occasional mistake. I have seen no convincing argument supporting either of those contentions.