Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sonny McWilliams who wrote (26244)	6/18/2000 8:05:00 PM
From: William Hunt	Respond to of 27012

Thread --thought you might be interested in this article : It'll be intriguing to see if Al Gore can make it through the summer without getting tagged with at least some of the blame for high gasoline prices. Much of the price rise has to do with the federally mandated introduction of something called "reformulated gasoline." It's an arcane subject most people don't know much about. But Mr. Gore does, and the re-election team is working hard to make sure responsibility for these high prices gets off-loaded on the usual suspects. In Milwaukee recently, Mr. Gore promised a "full investigation" into whether "price gouging" was to blame for high gas prices in southeastern Wisconsin and other parts of the Midwest. Oil refiners were summoned to Washington on Monday to explain themselves to the Environmental Protection Agency. And the Federal Trade Commission said Wednesday it had launched a probe of its own into possible "price-gouging." To be sure, OPEC's success under the tutelage of Mexican oil minister Luis Tellez in limiting oil production contributes to higher prices at the pump. But the high price of gasoline is mainly a story about environmental politics, and about making the air around us as squeaky clean as the author of "Earth in the Balance" can mandate it. The difference between $1.60 a gallon gas in most of the country and gas over $2 in certain places is largely due to the hyperzealous application of the 1990 Bush Administration Clean Air Act amendments by Mr. Gore's handpicked EPA Administrator, Carol Browner. Federal rules mandating a new summer blend of so-called reformulated gasoline, or RFG, came into effect June 1. Wisconsin gasoline retailers recently requested a temporary waiver of the RFG rules. The EPA rejected it. The state, in turn, is filing suit against the EPA. Yesterday the American Automobile Association sent a letter to Ms. Browner asking for a 90-day reprieve from the super-clean gasoline rules. Fat chance. Reformulated gasoline, now required in many of the country's urban areas, contains additives -- ethanol or a chemical called MTBE -- called oxygenates, which are supposed to promote more complete combustion and thereby reduce tailpipe emissions. Problem is, MTBE has been blamed for persistent groundwater pollution and a host of human ailments. Ethanol, meanwhile, makes the liquid fuel itself unstable, causing more evaporative pollution than would otherwise occur. Refining gasoline is a relatively complex process, and the mandated oxygenates make gasoline more expensive to produce. What's more, federal courts have all but granted a patent on the new gas to one company, Unocal, which seems to have gamed the mandate beautifully. Other refiners, who were recently ordered to pay $69 million in back royalties for the new gas, are considering litigating all the way to the Supreme Court. But if things are starting to look bad now, just wait for what the EPA has in store. Ms. Browner wants to ban MTBE, the oxygenate of choice for something like 80% of the reformulated gasoline produced, as a suspected carcinogen. (Refiners of course are bracing for a rash of liability suits from the Vice President's tort-lawyer contributors stemming from their compliance with the federal oxygenate mandate.) That would leave the alternative ethanol, the notorious Iowa caucus product, which is barely economical in the corn belt despite federal and state subsidies. Considering that the stuff can't be shipped in gasoline because it attracts moisture, it will pose even more of a problem for the rest of the country. Still, an effective ethanol monopoly will please the Administration's friends at the Archer Daniels Midland company, which controls 50% of the U.S. ethanol market. But its price isn't likely to please drivers. But there's more. The Gore-Browner EPA is now plotting draconian rules on the sulfur content of gasoline and diesel fuel. Years ago when gas prices were lower, Vice President Gore cast the tie-breaking Senate vote for President Clinton's 4.3 cent a gallon increase in the federal gas tax, now more than 18 cents. And of course virtually all the states also pile on gasoline taxes. In fact, there's no need to mandate oxygenates at all. Already companies like Chevron say they can blend gasolines without them with equal or better emissions performance. What's more, annual emissions of the worst auto exhaust pollutants have dropped by more than half since the 1960s, even though there are twice as many cars on the road today driving twice as many miles. Thanks to clean, modern engines, most of that improvement happened well before the RFG program appeared. The host of federal, state and local rules governing fuel production have gotten so bad that there hasn't been a single new gasoline refinery built in this country since the 1970s. And with the plants we've still got operating at full capacity, any little hiccup in the supply chain -- like a recent pipeline shutdown in Wisconsin -- is guaranteed to cause a problem at the filling station. Markets do have a way of reconciling restricted supply with hefty demand: higher prices. Something to ponder the next time you find yourself being Gored at the gas pump. BEST WISHES BILL

To: Sonny McWilliams who wrote (26244)	6/21/2000 4:08:00 PM
From: William Hunt	Respond to of 27012

Sonny ---thought you might be interested in the following link : npraqanda.com Seems that of the fifty per cent oil that we import it comes from the following countries : 1) Canada ---1.7 million barrels a day per NBC as of June 19 th ---not a member of OPEC 2)Mexico is number two ---member of OPEC 3)OPEC about 20 % of the US Total inputs Of the spare capacity in Opec most of it is located in our friends that we are protecting ,Saudi Arabia , Kuwait and United Arab Emirates . We are spending a billion dollars a year to protect theses countries ---very sad that we seem to have no leadership to help us become independent of this monopoly . The real issue is t developed our own resources : 1) to break free of this issue for national security 2) To destroy this cartel by just putting in motion a hydrogen program to break free of them and fossil fuels thus helping to eliminate pollution . Hope you had a great vacation BEST WISHES BILL

To: Sonny McWilliams who wrote (26244)	6/23/2000 3:27:00 PM
From: William Hunt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27012

Sonny ---Hope you had a great vacation ! The latest FUD : Oil price is a tax hike ---will slow economy down ---Government stands around with thumb up their sss . Oil price is inflationary ---FED must raise interest rates to combat inflation . Both sound so logical ---lets kill the economy and the market . Another down day before the FED meets ---I really believed these down days are orchestrated by the houses to keep the FED thinking the market is not running away . Besides they make money coming out and going back in . What a joke this game is getting to be . We need an energy policy ---the SEC should look into "Truth in Advertising " on Wall Street --What an oxy moron ! How are you stock picks doing ? If WCOM has any more lawyers involved they should shut down and go home . Looking forward to having you back BEST WISHES BILL

To: Sonny McWilliams who wrote (26244)	6/24/2000 8:06:00 AM
From: William Hunt	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27012

Sonny --This is what we need --- a lot of politics involved but if the EU can stopped the WCOM / SPRINT merger ? Bill will allow antitrust suits against OPEC June 24, 2000 Web posted at: 2:43 a.m. EDT (0643 GMT) From CNN Capitol Hill Producer Ted Barrett WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. consumers angered by the high price they are paying for gasoline will be able to sue the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, if a bill introduced in the House on Friday becomes law. Rep. Benjamin Gilman, R-N.Y., chairman of the House International Relations Committee, blamed the international oil cartel -- which sets production levels for many oil-producing nations -- for the recent spike in gas prices in this country when he announced the Foreign Trust Busting Act at a news conference. PRICING GASOLINE Click here to see how production costs affect the price of gasoline OIL PRODUCTION Click here to learn about the world's leading oil producers. GAS BUDGET CALCULATOR Click here to calculate how much you spend each year on gas -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You'll need Flash to view two of these features. If you don't have it, get it here FURTHER INFORMATION Questions and Answers concerning the cost of gas -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- How each state treats 'gas-and-dash' offenders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gasoline Pricing Trends in Chicago MESSAGE BOARD Rising oil prices "They turned the tap off. They reduced the supply to our nation," he said angrily. The bill would allow suits against overseas energy cartels by removing a legal obstacle known as the 'Act of State' doctrine, under which "courts generally don't question the official acts of foreign governments," Gilman said. The bill would allow judges to seize OPEC's American assets, according to an aide to the congressman. A second bill introduced by Gilman directs the president to ensure that the United States and other countries and organizations are not "directly or indirectly promoting the oil price-fixing activities, policies, and programs of OPEC." The purpose of the two bills, Gilman said, is "to give this administration and the next administration the tools they need to get a fair price of gas for American consumers." Midwest gas prices ease -- a little Gas prices in the Midwest -- one of the hardest-hit areas of the United States -- have begun to come down in recent days. Despite the downward trend, some motorists in the region still are facing gas prices of more than $2 per gallon. Industry analysts say pump prices are sometimes slow to reflect downward movement in wholesale prices because marketers still have to sell stocks bought at higher prices. cnn.com BEST WISHES BILL