Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (9690)	6/15/2000 2:02:00 AM
From: Rolla Coasta	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9980

Weapons that are capable of massive destruction and carnage. I feel the same way about biological and chemical weapons. I'm worried about those high tech foods too. A newly introduced genes are added to what we eat. IF there're defect genes which can cause harm to the public are added intentionally by individuals with agenda. The picture won't be pretty. I can guarantee you.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (9690)	6/15/2000 2:20:00 AM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9980

The difference between Lee's case and the others you cite is that no information has been released which suggests in any way that the material he apparently mishandled was intentionally or accidentally passed to a foreign power. He has not been charged with spying, yet he has been treated as a spy. If evidence exists that he was spying, I say by all means treat him as a spy, charge him with espionage, and if he is convicted, punish him. If such evidence does not exist, treat him as others who have mishandled information are treated. If the government does not charge Lee with espionage and present evidence to support the charge, there will always be the suspicion that he is the victim of a race-inspired witch hunt, an effort to blame one individual for the entire Chinese espionage effort, or both.