SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Howe who wrote (46727)6/15/2000 1:37:00 AM
From: Don Edgerton  Respond to of 74651
 
How ironic. The DOJ goes against the stock manipulators and the "mob" who bilked old people out of $50 million or so. And yet the DOJ through this Microsoft fiasco has cost retirees billions in the impact on their investments in MSFT and mutual funds which held MSFT - not withstanding the deep correction that was in my opinion precipitated by the findings and the proposed penalties. No stock fruad/manipulation in history equals the damage wrought by those egotistical jerks in DOJ and the state AGs.



To: David Howe who wrote (46727)6/15/2000 1:54:00 AM
From: JC Jaros  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 74651
 
Oh it can't be something you disagree with. It needs to be 'misinformation'. That's karma. --- I don't know where you were when Windows was establishibg supremecy. Probably not near a PC. GEOworks was a better product. Desqview handled multitasking infinitely better. It seems to me I remember something about Windows being made to not work with the other (better) DOS versions, ie, PC-DOS, DR-DOS. Anything in there 'misinformation'? --- Let's settle this information question once and for all. Lets all get full documentation to Windows. --- That's not gonna happen is it? That's the reason for this extended charade; avoidance of exactly that publication. The publication of information. --- Is there anything *to Microsoft beyond bullshit? -JCJ



To: David Howe who wrote (46727)6/15/2000 1:13:00 PM
From: cheryl williamson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
So we are both biased. So what???