Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mozek who wrote (46733)	6/15/2000 2:04:00 PM
From: JC Jaros	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 74651

Yes mozek. The people 'attacking' Microsoft are all dedicated followers of fashion. That's why they're there! --- Only a monopoly could get away with making that kind of dismissal and not have to worry about consequences. --- Regarding BBSs and Windows <bzzzt>. People didn't run BBSs under Windows because Windows SUCKED. Funny how SysOps had no problem feeding the OS/2 GUI after that became available. --- Re: QEMM, where do you think MS got Win 3.x memory management from? You think they came up with that themselves? --- This breakup stuff is SO not needed. I'm against it like so many of the MSFT shareholders. How many shareholders are aware that all that MS needed to do was to agree to publish full documentation? How many are aware that the level of M$ sham extends to not even doing that much to get to resolution? Microsoft needn't give up copyright. They merely need to avail the Windows source code (documentation) for reading, so that everyone is equally informed. Information is the enemy though, isn't it mozek? -JCJ