SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hans de Vries who wrote (115967)6/15/2000 1:17:00 PM
From: chic_hearne  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577883
 
Hans,

I have a question for you.

Intel plans to move to .13um on Al and I just don't think this is possible. I'm sure they can yield some parts, but from what I know it will be very difficult to get good yields. AMD should be getting great yields on .13um because of copper.

Where do the benefits of copper come in? Can you get decent yields on .13um Al as Intel is suggesting, or are AMD and IBM correct by not trying to push Al to .13um and smaller?

chic



To: Hans de Vries who wrote (115967)6/15/2000 1:37:00 PM
From: 5dave22  Respond to of 1577883
 
Hans <After the stock price dived 10% caused by an erroneous article in EE Times.>

A blessing in disguise. I got some yesterday @ $83 and more today @ $81 1/8. I'm lovin' it.

David



To: Hans de Vries who wrote (115967)6/15/2000 3:31:00 PM
From: Petz  Respond to of 1577883
 
hans, re:<all-time record AMD Trade: Buy for $53,851,250>
I didn't realize you were that rich! Can you spare a few shares?

Petz


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News