Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandeep who wrote (46805)	6/15/2000 4:58:00 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 74651

As an interesting historical footnote, Judge Jackson has had some previous experience with 3A(6). It is my understanding that Judge Jackson presided over the Marion Barry trial, and then gave a post trial interview. It is also my understanding that, normally 3A(6) is a blanket prohibition, the intent is to keep the Judiciary out of all controversy. It is also my understanding that the Barry court held that Judge Jackson did not violate 3A(6) in the Barry matter. This is from newspaper reports only. I have not discussed the matter with Steve Gillers, but he is probably the country's leading authority on the subject.