Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (2471)	6/15/2000 11:51:00 PM
From: D.B. Cooper	Respond to of 13572

Remember the lawsuit On January 18, 2000, Rambus filed a patent infringement suit against Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi Semiconductor (America), Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, based on four patents covering SDRAM and DDR SDRAM memory products and the SH microprocessors that directly interface with them. On February 29, 2000, Rambus filed a second patent infringement suit in Delaware involving two additional U.S. patents that cover Hitachi DDR SDRAMs and certain SH microprocessors. A total of eight patents are currently involved in the ITC and Federal District Court proceedings. This could mean that Tosiba agrees with the lawsuit and that RMBS case has merits. This could mean that RMBS would be paid for SDRAM or DDRAM or RDRAM it does't matter. Sort of the argument of QCOM and CDMA. Good Luck Don