SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bilow who wrote (44535)6/16/2000 9:02:00 AM
From: gnuman  Respond to of 93625
 
Carl, re: <Even with RDRAM royalties of 1 or 2%, the royalties are not a significant reason for the high cost of the technology.>
First, discount the cost of RDRAM technology, we're talking about the increased cost of DDRDRAM technology. A 1 - 2% increase in costs wouldn't be a significant adder on a relatively inexpensive technology. (The consumer pays it anyway). But compare an additional 1 - 2% for DDRDRAM to the cost of PC800 to the consumer.
I think we end up with a win/win situation if the chip makers give in. Getting Intel and Rambus off their back may be well worth it. <g>
To me , the key result will be the resolution of an issue that has the industry in major conflict.
JMHO.



To: Bilow who wrote (44535)6/16/2000 4:07:00 PM
From: gnuman  Respond to of 93625
 
Carl, re: <I don't think there is any way that the major memory makers are going to pay even 1% royalties on SDRAM or DDR. >
I don't know what the Hitachi litigation involves, but apparently the other DRAM makers didn't want to get dragged into that situation. But now it seem's the industry is under attack. The question now is, will they break ranks or will they strengthen their resolve and fight as an alliance? If you're right, that would be the next big news.
JMHO