SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (81955)6/16/2000 11:51:00 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
>This is a perfect example of the kind of argument I'm protesting. We are debating the
fitness and desirability of the existing schedule of penalties. It is not logically acceptable
to oppose an adjustment in the schedule of penalties on the grounds that such an
adjustment would disrupt the schedule of penalties.<

Yeah- it is fitting because you want to start with it BEING fitting. I got that. Thank you. It is your religion. I understand.



To: Neocon who wrote (81955)6/16/2000 6:09:00 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Steve finally got the argument, although he demurred from the specific conclusion.

He still considers the argument to be grotesquely insufficient, and the conclusion utterly flawed, but he hasn't got time to say why.

Later, maybe. Life intervenes.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News