Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (371)	6/16/2000 6:42:00 PM
From: Tom Swift	Respond to of 12465

Congrats to all of the defendants! It is good to see that the justice system does work.

To: tonto who wrote (371)	6/16/2000 7:59:00 PM
From: Mighty_Mezz	Respond to of 12465

WTG! Case was BS on its face, and should have have been tossed immediately for failure to pass the laugh test. ...Mezz - TORT REFORM NOW!

To: tonto who wrote (371)	6/16/2000 8:45:00 PM
From: John Sladek	Respond to of 12465

Janice, Congrat's everyone. Regards, John Sladek

To: tonto who wrote (371)	6/16/2000 9:21:00 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Some are having difficulty with understanding that the Court ruled in our favor and against AZNT. Let us review what the judge wrote. It is ordered and Adjudged that the defendant D. Todd(sic)Pauly's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is GRANTED. Judgement is hereby entered in favor of the defendant Pauly and against the plaintiff. The case filing states the following: ...All causes of action asserted against Defendant D. Tod Pauly are DISMISSED. DATED: June 14, 2000 Philip M. Pro United States District Judge