SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: H James Morris who wrote (105065)6/17/2000 12:27:00 PM
From: re3  Respond to of 164684
 
james on a one year basis, most of the big cap golds outperformed swc...

not so though year to date...

quicken.excite.com



To: H James Morris who wrote (105065)6/18/2000
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Respond to of 164684
 
<<I'd rather own Platinum/Palladium than Amazon.com.>>

I'd rather own rusted tin cans than AMZN. They depreciate more slowly!<NG>



To: H James Morris who wrote (105065)6/18/2000 11:44:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
James,

I was briefly reading about fuel cells and have a question. How does one get the hydrogen out of oil, natural gas, etc. economically? They are hydrocarbons but do we not need pure hydrogen at the end here?



To: H James Morris who wrote (105065)6/18/2000 3:36:00 PM
From: GST  Respond to of 164684
 
HJ: I am quite familiar with the white metals and agree with you 100%, but I still believ that there is a place for gold stocks -- just happens to be for completely different reasons. SWC has been a favorite of mine for many years.