SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael L. Voorhees who wrote (46938)6/17/2000 1:18:00 PM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Michael - seems like thiis reporter did not do his homework - My understanding is that Jackson did not in fact find any evidence of overcharging and certainly did not attach a specific dollar amount. And according to other reporting on this lawsuit consolidation, it was actually in response to the fact that the basis of the original suits was eliminated by the final ruling. But then I'm not a lawyer, I just know what I read in the papers <GG>.



To: Michael L. Voorhees who wrote (46938)6/17/2000 1:23:00 PM
From: SC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Which is why the DOJ case will never be settled now. Microsofts best chance of discouraging the avalanche of civil suits is nullifying Judge Jackson's findings at the Appeals Court and/or Supreme Court. At this point, they have nothing more to lose and everything to gain by pursuing their appeal to the conclusion.

Steve


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News